From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.botz.org (thalamus.botz.org [207.210.96.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.botz.org", Issuer "mail.botz.org" (not verified)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F1D921F113 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (syzygy.botz.org [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.botz.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7GIFVFC025662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:15:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=thaldk; d=botz.org; c=simple; q=dns; b=EtYwOFGUuYfWZQ5uMGAaY79SVbV7TGmA6ivO8LZQZTYBeERhSO5eOoBk3uK7lUiFa +FFJk6ddEweGz0gVNBtmQ== DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=botz.org; s=thalamus; t=1376676933; bh=oXoduKSYTlJHsgpYh6jm0mFqGiQ=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Scanned-By; b=FpNiNhVTIxe1 qdTc+MyLzn9Eklk0/9t4jAqg4Z6pIbnBbW1j3yttx9mUm8ywleFUML9UoB0IGA6M1Ql j/MjamoXRlLxc7PmhFxy7B4WKVAwwNdwZ2pRhTjQENVGosEmrlfH30myEepHr5orwjI Ezzz8cZSEc0RANDt6NO4Whfiw= Message-ID: <520E6BBD.9060502@botz.org> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:13:17 -0300 From: Juergen Botz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht References: <520D47AA.8050408@botz.org> <520E33B7.2020008@botz.org> <520E6864.6010401@botz.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 207.210.96.137 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Meshing broken? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:13:24 -0000 On 08/16/2013 03:06 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > You need to statically assign addresses on the server box. Ok, fair enough... but then why did it work without statically assigned addresses in 3.7.x? :j