From: Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] development build 3.10.17-1 released
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:35:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526395C7.7030403@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4xL1yKm=nxya9YG288puja8e5UoK7u8Op2+g3zmZMKWA@mail.gmail.com>
Works correctly here. Thank you for your efforts.
On 20/10/13 06:41, Dave Taht wrote:
> + sync with openwrt
> + dnsmasq 2.67rc4
> + get_cycles() and /dev/random fixes
> + mild firewall changes
> + actually sort of tested
> - sysupgrade still busted
> - didn't package the jitter rng
>
> The simple expedient of putting a script in /etc/rc.local to restart
> pimd, minissdpd, and dnsmasq 60 seconds after boot appears to get us a
> working dhcp/dns on the wifi interfaces once again.
>
> dnsmasq wasn't busted, it was how it interfaces to netifd. the march
> down to something deployable resumes with rc4.
>
> This is the first test that I know of, of some of the RNG fixes
> upstream, notably the mips code does the right thing with a highly
> optimized "get_cycles()".
>
> There are two changes to the firewall code
>
> 1) There has been a long-standing error in not blocking port 161
> (snmp) from the outside world. It is now blocked by default.
>
> Although I am not aware of any exploits of this (besides the
> information leakage) I would recommend blocking this port by default
> on your existing builds, also, or disabling the snmp daemon entirely
> if you do not use it.
>
> 2) Usage of the "pattern matching syntax" on various firewall rules.
>
> Instead of 3 rules for se00,sw00,sw10, and 4 for gw00,gw10,gw01,gw11
> there are now 1 rule for s+ and one rule for gw+
>
> This does not show up in the web interface correctly. I'd also like to
> get to a more efficient rule set for the blocked ports, perhaps with
> ipset...
>
> ...
>
> It's sort of my hope that with these fixes that the march towards a
> stable release can resume, and we get some fresh shiny new bugs out of
> this.
>
> Upcoming next are a revised version of pie, more random number fixes,
> and I forget what else.
>
>
> 3)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-20 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-20 5:41 Dave Taht
2013-10-20 8:35 ` Fred Stratton [this message]
2013-10-20 13:12 ` Fred Stratton
2013-10-20 13:17 ` David Personette
2013-10-20 13:41 ` Fred Stratton
2013-10-20 13:55 ` David Personette
2013-10-21 4:11 ` Michael Richardson
2013-10-21 9:26 ` David Personette
2013-10-21 12:22 ` David Personette
2013-10-21 13:50 ` [Cerowrt-devel] development build 3.10.17-2 released Fred Stratton
2013-10-21 14:46 ` David Personette
2013-10-21 15:39 ` Fred Stratton
2013-10-21 16:38 ` Fred Stratton
2013-10-21 17:18 ` David Personette
2013-10-21 18:23 ` Dave Taht
2013-10-21 1:22 ` [Cerowrt-devel] development build 3.10.17-1 released Dave Taht
[not found] <5264020C.2030203@imap.cc>
2013-10-20 16:18 ` Fred Stratton
2013-10-20 16:25 ` Fred Stratton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526395C7.7030403@imap.cc \
--to=fredstratton@imap.cc \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox