From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF8621F147 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2CB20770; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:39:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:39:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=jpFXCWqovWc3qvtT/AX0+Jm/ sM8=; b=HXz2Ak62QiGLyWc/rs7eAZOG/od5Gz3EFow2iXjqa0J94j/j92HfSx9/ WpNcHUKcnzsLHEw1R0oLf7ajc9IXl9XTWH7Go5LCmYLgIFsOhifzzEmxaqNmRm5I dn4wsyju8s1WixOU2vTBCxtOArQfMY9KVmAup+yca2+L1oy43KA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=jpFX CWqovWc3qvtT/AX0+Jm/sM8=; b=Xu9i6I/98iDZ9UgTn0ZlLbbwDq+6AwP+wn/k l/uIheO9Xq6abC1IAiQGFt7N5Ph/mtcXQtpHisjvWN9NV3SwE4Eq5+RqUULD8B5x pJ6aQ+m11QF8GlG45yAjfx1y2FPcszIinn5uRNGRM3yvqWkmrgRvEYEypNnmXa/C bEsPbwE= X-Sasl-enc: KzOkOnAGstm9v2uBSTfadyiCZ6yljCmF4J8rHseKzOjq 1382369968 Received: from [172.30.42.8] (unknown [2.96.52.30]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CB6326801EC for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <52654AAF.6070300@imap.cc> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:39:27 +0100 From: Fred Stratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <5263D6D0.6090800@imap.cc> <5263DD9D.4070604@imap.cc> <16274.1382328717@sandelman.ca> <5265312A.5030409@imap.cc> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050006030100020909010804" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] development build 3.10.17-2 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:39:30 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050006030100020909010804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK. I would have untarred in /tmp and mv'd files one by one otherwise. Your route sounds better. Thank you. On 21/10/13 15:46, David Personette wrote: > If you made a config backup, you can restore it by scp'ing it to your > router, and extracting it in /. > > IE: 'cd / && tar xvzf /root/backup-cerowrt-2013-10-06.tar.gz' > > -- > David P. > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Fred Stratton > wrote: > > I have installed this build, but cannot access the web interface. > Am presently trying to determine how to reinstall the > configuration file from the cli, other than item by item, so I can > attempt to rebuild the build from within. Have reverted to earlier > build for now to regain internet access. > > > On 21/10/13 13:22, David Personette wrote: >> I'm not sure what's changed but 3.10.17-2 is working for me, so far. >> >> Was anyone paying attention to nftables (iptables replacement)? I >> just saw that it was merged into net-next. On the LTS 3.10.x it >> won't have any impact for now, and apparently there's a backwards >> compatibility utility to still process iptables rules... >> >> -- >> David P. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:26 AM, David Personette >> > wrote: >> >> FYI: direct changes to the /overlay aren't noticed by the >> kernel, you have to reboot first. I can't say that I'm an >> expert, I've just poked around at it. I just deleted the >> whole directory (IE: rm -rf /overlay/etc/uci-defaults). Upon >> reboot the entire directory is reverted to the contents of /rom. >> >> -- >> David P. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Richardson >> > wrote: >> >> >> David Personette > > wrote: >> > you have made a change, then it's read from the >> overlay. A change that you can >> > make is deleting a file that exists on the /rom >> image, and that can be stored >> > on the overlay as well (the file will be not be >> visible in the merged /). You >> > can purge changes that you have made by removing >> the corresponding file(s) and/ >> > or directory(s) in the /overlay filesystem. >> >> How do I see/delete the mark in the /overlay that marks >> the file in the /rom as >> deleted? >> >> -- >> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ >> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | >> network architect [ >> ] mcr@sandelman.ca >> http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --------------050006030100020909010804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OK. I would have untarred in /tmp and mv'd files one by one otherwise.

Your route sounds better.

Thank you.

On 21/10/13 15:46, David Personette wrote:
If you made a config backup, you can restore it by scp'ing it to your router, and extracting it in /.

IE: 'cd / && tar xvzf /root/backup-cerowrt-2013-10-06.tar.gz'

--
David P.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
I have installed this build, but cannot access the web interface. Am presently trying to determine how to reinstall the configuration file from the cli, other than item by item, so I can attempt to rebuild the build from within. Have reverted to earlier build for now to regain internet access.


On 21/10/13 13:22, David Personette wrote:
I'm not sure what's changed but 3.10.17-2 is working for me, so far.

Was anyone paying attention to nftables (iptables replacement)? I just saw that it was merged into net-next. On the LTS 3.10.x it won't have any impact for now, and apparently there's a backwards compatibility utility to still process iptables rules...

--
David P.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:26 AM, David Personette <dperson@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI: direct changes to the /overlay aren't noticed by the kernel, you have to reboot first. I can't say that I'm an expert, I've just poked around at it. I just deleted the whole directory (IE: rm -rf /overlay/etc/uci-defaults). Upon reboot the entire directory is reverted to the contents of /rom.

--
David P.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:

David Personette <dperson@gmail.com> wrote:
    > you have made a change, then it's read from the overlay. A change that you can
    > make is deleting a file that exists on the /rom image, and that can be stored
    > on the overlay as well (the file will be not be visible in the merged /). You
    > can purge changes that you have made by removing the corresponding file(s) and/
    > or directory(s) in the /overlay filesystem.

How do I see/delete the mark in the /overlay that marks the file in the /rom as
deleted?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [





_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



--------------050006030100020909010804--