From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E51E21F1DE for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 02:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2757921C98; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:01:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:01:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=wSugg5YzWZuSC5tqEDDDhOkwZFI=; b=vukRSpjG+2JTTlQFuw0mdrqwLFDG EMW2+vwE/Ot1C43UQW2wLiaFFjlv2tHiwwXhu74fNxUErffYGOgGNqv33YrvQfQB SXG+5CPjG2Yqldp9z5/Ybj70gY0QtzGUS7/0sAayjXJ3k+1XEmvkWNpy/StC6DR3 qSnCXDQHFKE6uRE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=wSugg5YzWZuSC5tqEDDDhO kwZFI=; b=quOphQj/gvju1g21oB/tH8wUZ9Dutsah2rmWmySW+llrZyr5Zhjxo1 DWA10Q9+tMmRh+YJgyIr2DVTk/9FvLFvV1hFTKnT6rt1qjaQks5yuYbAfHrxaKfK EnRZ9Z2rEZhNwGkZYPhV8maQK9FnsKe9wCtgObz0Ymfm26sfQz2BM= X-Sasl-enc: YcfDvtKfR7ORLTG5JREKscpnggsqsGC8rI/bCoWX/PIt 1383382913 Received: from [172.30.42.8] (unknown [2.96.53.233]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6254FC00E81; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:01:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5274BF80.4000001@imap.cc> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:01:52 +0000 From: Fred Stratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.10.17-6 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:01:56 -0000 Again, PPPoE does not function. Corroboration - or, better still, a workaround - would be useful. I am not the only person with a PPPoE connection. On 02/11/13 02:17, Dave Taht wrote: > + resync with openwrt > + dnsmasq 2.68test1 > + pie v3 (as submitted to the netdev list) > - no sysupgrade fix > - dnsmasq still restarted via /etc/rc.local > > That's at: > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.17-6/ > > untested. I am getting in a vehicle for vancouver in 2 minutes.... > > I also just built (and tested) the same code for the nanostation m5 > and picostation. > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/nano-m/3.10.17-6/ > > Note: this is a rather specialized build for the yurtlab, with > hardcoded ips and a hard dependency on babel being up and running, and > it was a collossal PITA to make it do both a mesh and a AP mode (basically > wlan0 MUST be the AP, wlan0-1 can be ad-hoc and then you have to edit > the network and dhcp and babel files appropriately... which I should > document if anyone cares to try this hardware. (I also note this has > my public key allowed in by default, you should nuke it if you try it) > > Unless more bugs show up in pie or dnsmasq I'm not going to touch this > stuff for a week. See you at ietf! The aqm and iccrg and webrtc and > rmcat meetings should be pretty interesting. >