Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] PIE and ADSL2+
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:15:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528F20BA.4060708@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8B8A306F-3E06-445D-9336-3E6F33533BFA@gmx.de>

Thank you.

Are you still using ADSL2+, Sebastian, or have you moved to fibre?


On 22/11/13 09:10, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:08 , Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
>
>> I have been using PIE instead of fq_codel for approximately 10 days. It works well.
> 	Intrigued by your report I went ahead and tested simple.qos with fq_codel and pie (cerowrt 3.10.18-1) with rrul against  demo.tohojo.dk:
>   /netperf-wrapper -l 300 -H demo.tohojo.dk rrul -p all_scaled -t my_silly_name
>
> 	Pie (with the default target of 20ms(?) shows around 120 ms ping delay (fq_codel shows 45ms) also the average downlink with fq_codel is roughly 10% higher than with pie. So at least in that test fq_codel seems better than pie. That said, compared to ping latencies up to 300ms (my primary router somehow restricts ;agencies to roughly 300ms)  with no AQM, just rate shaping with HTB, pie still keeps the internet more useable.
> 	
>> Should it?
> 	I think its designers wanted it to be a competent disc, so I guess it should :)
>
>> Has PIE been optimized for ADSL?
> Best Regards
> 	Sebastian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-22  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 10:08 Fred Stratton
2013-11-22  9:10 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-11-22  9:15   ` Fred Stratton [this message]
     [not found]     ` <B9035D41-ACD6-4A8F-9878-8D345F5E248D@gmx.de>
2013-11-22  9:31       ` Fred Stratton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528F20BA.4060708@imap.cc \
    --to=fredstratton@imap.cc \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox