From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D302821F17F for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:06:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68CD20F2C; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:06:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:06:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=QaOaGRpz7j42aYD8Wf0VB5ZsteM=; b=SeRDsQwsnR9tskg54BwKT9wu0qL4 VlaxoqtBtJqwKpTw/xcqmZ0iSZVz1aDFs2ockv9hxQXwcx891Aa7lf2qC4q1Cfr3 okRDsALih+zBwD3iZHkzxC6nAfuoo84/ZL4XiQPLgKCHAVBDw+KenozA+uBCeLG2 LvJCMua7ri53yXM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=QaOaGRpz7j42aYD8Wf0VB5 ZsteM=; b=g3pGGZCgPgSl523Tz/I/4PbIiBs3zmMb6RjPiHPhJ25dK7qDGYoCJu XKp/KA8NXNAfr9SGgaI4KGjU+psBWNzUnD6FGNBFP9ZwPr8GyxBSsdYFH+XNLj8S zh2Yt/gwhRqGH57tpgpGGGX1y8HI8eAEQdCsPny7Aw3vYnGQfPcyk= X-Sasl-enc: oo81rfN1M0iXtbjcVvXgITI01VY5GMS7XjU/vtPCW1sL 1387231615 Received: from [172.30.42.8] (unknown [78.145.44.3]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 431DBC00E7F; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:06:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52AF797E.6030600@imap.cc> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:06:54 +0000 From: Fred Stratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Lang , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:06:57 -0000 For best 5GHz results, get rid of your walls and doors... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/14/virgin_media_superhub_update_modem_mode/ On 16/12/13 21:28, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Dave Taht wrote: > >> I have long used "5" as an indicator that the 5ghz channel was better. >> This goes back to a long thread on nanog, like 4? 5? years ago, where >> the hope was to train users that "5" was better. >> >> Well, it's turned out that 5 is frequently better, but not always, AND >> that clients tend to go for the shortest of the SSIDs available. So a >> thought would be to create another ad-hoc standard for deprecating 2.4 >> ghz, and have the shorter SSID be the 5ghz one. >> >> Ideas for the 2ghz channel: >> >> CEROwrt-legacy >> CEROwrt2 >> >> I'm not huge on "legacy" because it's rather long but am stuck for >> standards, I'd like a default 2.4 ghz SSID that clearly indicates the >> real use to which 2.4ghz is suitable, like: >> CEROwrt-GET-OFF-MY-BABY-MONITOR-YOU-FREAK >> >> ideas for another ssid naming standard slightly longer than a single >> digit that would make sense to mom? > > for the Scale conference this year, we are going to use scale and > scale-slow to try and discourage people from using 2.4 > > David Lang > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel