From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B68121F0F0 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:32:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1684D20C65; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:32:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:32:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=9aysJ0xUO/NEuu3O4aHCBX5utGQ=; b=v/fM5yxwCZDFRGyvI4roaM58ulUb XpEb0CMxrtJldtsR7EdTAKd2yII1Fn1FmtBCaQWWEoxsX/AmTOqRYAMVB/gK1Ut1 NhOCMXr/aqm/cwstSwAF85cMqVj8nP3VcEPBZnuft67qJGbW/Thzpld65wcNrr0M e+zgd+PSB9FXZiw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=9aysJ0xUO/NEuu3O4aHCBX 5utGQ=; b=TMPlufuQeieBE2maewjNlO/2dE/cigIv0x+tHSpDkQXKtHupP5BvU0 wKLqmQzJ8Ob5B4W6SAiiW0iE2EDENR48BakQbHbo7uYZDF2qmu6RjYA4LXSioouK fE+QopybQaF/5BV0rE9XqPEcPcJq+rhbQHcciDqSyArYlXROWmcYM= X-Sasl-enc: 4RtyLbMsT2jgWjlD5axl/HPc6S+pl/vZMmDH2GT0Ni/9 1387377160 Received: from [172.30.42.8] (unknown [89.240.239.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C29EC00E81 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:32:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52B1B206.10106@imap.cc> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:32:38 +0000 From: Fred Stratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <52B1A48A.1020007@imap.cc> In-Reply-To: <52B1A48A.1020007@imap.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Intuition of this guy improved his 1, 5 Mbit DSL line -spelling correction X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:32:43 -0000 Spelling correction. On 18/12/13 13:35, Fred Stratton wrote: > I used TomatoUSB -the shibby builds, rather than the Toastman ones- > for several years prior to moving to OpenWRT and then ceroWRT. > > The TomatoUSB community has repeatedly shouted down any attempts to > discuss Gettys' original findings, so it has been up to individuals to > find QoS solutions. > > Shibby has the best QoS implementation. > > http://tomato.groov.pl > > I did not get very far. It was not possible to watch flash video and > download simultaneously on a 4 megabit/s ADSL2+ line. > > The problem has been largely solved with the last 3 builds of CeroWRT. > > > On 18/12/13 11:23, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Story from slashodot: >> A guy moved to a low speed DSL connection. When describing what he's >> done to make it work better, among other things, he mentioned he >> configured QoS to be below his cap. He put 1100 Mb limit on a 1500 Mb >> line. >> >> He's not using the benefits of fq_codel on his TomatoUSB but he's on >> the right track. >> >> His intuition is good: >> http://www.tidbitsfortechs.com/2013/12/surviving-internet-on-low-speed-dsl/ >> >> >> Would be cool for him to check out latest openwrt if his device can >> handle it. >> >> Best regards, >> Maciej >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel