Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Re: CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?

[Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2766 bytes --]

I have been using pie for approximately 3 weeks.

You are correct, in that the outbound speed is about 800 - 900 kb/s.

I shall try what you suggest, but do not know how to express the target 
of 25 ms as a configuration option.


On 27/12/13 19:15, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try 
> fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or 
> so as best I recall?)
>
> On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
>
>     I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23.
>
>     I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding
>     /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>
>     input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm
>
>     rebooted
>
>     and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far.
>
>
>     On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>>     A race condition appears to have crept in...
>>
>>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>     From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com>>
>>     Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM
>>     Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
>>     To: "Richard E. Brown" <richb.hanover@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:richb.hanover@gmail.com>>
>>     Cc:
>>
>>     Probably didn't start sqm properly
>>
>>     Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>>
>>     tc -s qdisc show dev ge00
>>
>>     Should show htb and fq codel.
>>
>>     On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" <richb.hanover@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:richb.hanover@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware
>>         in my primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked
>>         well as a secondary, so I figured, What the heck… Let’s give
>>         it try.
>>
>>         The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM
>>         page, chose the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and
>>         link layer to ATM with no additional overhead for my DSL link.
>>
>>         Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I
>>         fired up speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net>, they jumped to
>>         1500-2500 msec. Is there something I should look at before
>>         reverting? Thanks.
>>
>>         Rich
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>         Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>         <mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>         https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>     Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net  <mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5470 bytes --]