From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA75200BD0 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:20:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD7121C46; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:20:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:20:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=tOOen6uPNUGlSotqgGndv4y+ ADI=; b=h53u0RxmaEJIEH4OZkere5YB29TWb/QMNHsIPC3/2P4EJeu2CXo/k/Zn P3Z9BxD37kdttDKr3vU+NSa7IzIVCLAAHZgq/S78aNVVxBhhceCclmTVp8HB3juF YvOmzF+W7pLrgC7vQKBOkG/2HNLIxCr2GNgebnMxUzsu0B8sCVE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=tOOe n6uPNUGlSotqgGndv4y+ADI=; b=KB/sVD9OznjN+IkKMS2X9Oy1dCNvbCkGoHz1 DREJ298qVe3+6UPdYqbXqrb/5rBuICyhKVrLZ11ngt3Rhk2FlgfRrcC4W2R6OGWX Swu555Esu7yE7ZtGYml4BWqwFw6KKs0DMDIljIEXBsBRGfJCpN8JO1rJrd+yf62x IZnwEaY= X-Sasl-enc: rJaGgIjvECaomF4c2qxv1bKlXxr2ifHcAa80+lxILUPM 1388172040 Received: from [172.30.42.8] (unknown [2.99.251.72]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8D8F56800AD; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:20:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52BDD303.8070102@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:20:35 +0000 From: Fred Stratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <571C0EE5-DC15-4A9C-A195-A97F93A335EB@gmail.com> <52BDD08F.2000904@imap.cc> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030008090804010607060509" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Re: CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:20:42 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030008090804010607060509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I have been using pie for approximately 3 weeks. You are correct, in that the outbound speed is about 800 - 900 kb/s. I shall try what you suggest, but do not know how to express the target of 25 ms as a configuration option. On 27/12/13 19:15, Dave Taht wrote: > > Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try > fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or > so as best I recall?) > > On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" wrote: > > I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23. > > I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding > /etc/init.d/sqm restart > > input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm > > rebooted > > and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far. > > > On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> A race condition appears to have crept in... >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Dave Taht" > >> Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM >> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated? >> To: "Richard E. Brown" > > >> Cc: >> >> Probably didn't start sqm properly >> >> Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart >> >> tc -s qdisc show dev ge00 >> >> Should show htb and fq codel. >> >> On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" > > wrote: >> >> So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware >> in my primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked >> well as a secondary, so I figured, What the heck… Let’s give >> it try. >> >> The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM >> page, chose the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and >> link layer to ATM with no additional overhead for my DSL link. >> >> Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I >> fired up speedtest.net , they jumped to >> 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I should look at before >> reverting? Thanks. >> >> Rich >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --------------030008090804010607060509 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I have been using pie for approximately 3 weeks.

You are correct, in that the outbound speed is about 800 - 900 kb/s.

I shall try what you suggest, but do not know how to express the target of 25 ms as a configuration option.


On 27/12/13 19:15, Dave Taht wrote:

Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or so as best I recall?)

On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23.

I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding
/etc/init.d/sqm restart

input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm

rebooted

and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far.


On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote:

A race condition appears to have crept in...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
To: "Richard E. Brown" <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Cc:

Probably didn't start sqm properly

Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart

tc -s qdisc show dev ge00

Should show htb and fq codel.

On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware in my primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked well as a secondary, so I figured, What the heck… Let’s give it try.

The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM page, chose the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and link layer to ATM with no additional overhead for my DSL link.

Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I fired up speedtest.net, they jumped to 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I should look at before reverting? Thanks.

Rich
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


--------------030008090804010607060509--