Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?/Not anymore...

[Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1696 bytes --]

The 'Enabled' checkbox is disabled by default.

I would have no problem with it being enabled by default, but would like 
it retained.

I use a TP-Link device to bridge to the phone line. In the next year, a 
build of OpenWRT will appear which I can apply to this, with all the 
ceroWRT changes incorporated in it hopefully.

I envisage testing the operation of that device as a full gateway, and 
using the ceroWRT device as an access point in the testing period, with 
sqm partly or wholly disabled on it.


On 27/12/13 20:59, Rich Brown wrote:
>>
>> Probably didn't start sqm properly
>>
>> Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>>
>> tc -s qdisc show dev ge00
>>
>> Should show htb and fq codel.
>>
> Uh oh. PEBCAK (Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard :-)
>
> I see the problem... There's this little checkbox in the "Basic 
> Settings" of the GUI... It's labeled "Enable" and hidden in plain 
> sight above all the interesting stuff in that tab. If it isn't 
> checked, the router is just as bloated as every other home router.
>
> However, if you *do* check it, everything works as desired. Whew!
>
> A few thoughts which might keep this from ever happening again:
>
> - Was it disabled by default? (I don't remember unchecking it...)
> - Is there even a reason to have the "Enable" checkbox? Would there 
> ever be a circumstance where a person wouldn't want SQM?
> - Could the "Enable" checkbox be replaced by another "Not Enabled" 
> entry in the "Interface name" dropdown?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4689 bytes --]