From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
Received: from eyas.biff.org.uk (eyas.biff.org.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:519c::20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D0121F14E
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu,  6 Feb 2014 02:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cl-1441.lon-02.gb.sixxs.net ([2a01:348:6:5a0::2]:42082
	helo=central.thekelleys.org.uk)
	by eyas.biff.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>)
	id 1WBMaJ-0007s7-VK; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:53:32 +0000
Received: from spike.thekelleys.org.uk ([192.168.0.193])
	by central.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>)
	id 1WBMaJ-0004hh-5Q; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:53:31 +0000
Message-ID: <52F369AA.5060809@thekelleys.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:53:30 +0000
From: Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
References: <CAA93jw4nAzXdgRq34SXssOBS_F0Jh8qfLVRMj9_0h3jv3OUrUA@mail.gmail.com>	<87a9e6xcae.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk>
	<87ob2lmqny.fsf@toke.dk>	<52F29645.6010001@thekelleys.org.uk>	<874n4dwcdb.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk>	<52F2BA80.9010202@thekelleys.org.uk>
	<87iossvgw4.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk>
In-Reply-To: <87iossvgw4.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Testers wanted: DNSSEC.
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:53:34 -0000

On 06/02/14 07:28, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Simon Kelley<simon@thekelleys.org.uk>  writes:
>
>> That's straightforward. Dnsmasq gets a query for
>> 62.75.115.213.in-addr.arpa, sends it upstream, gets an answer which
>> isn't signed, and determines that it's insecure, then returns the
>> answer.
>
> Right, that's what I thought. So everything is working as it should? :)
>
> -Toke

Everything is working as I would expect it to. If that's correct or not 
depends on how well I've understood the standard, and is a a whole 
different question :-)

Cheers,

Simon.