From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eyas.biff.org.uk (eyas.biff.org.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:519c::20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE1B21F1C3 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:39:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from cl-1441.lon-02.gb.sixxs.net ([2a01:348:6:5a0::2]:48389 helo=central.thekelleys.org.uk) by eyas.biff.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCpCp-0006G8-0Y; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:39:19 +0000 Received: from spike.thekelleys.org.uk ([192.168.0.193]) by central.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCpCn-0001oT-5g; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:39:17 +0000 Message-ID: <52F8BA64.2050401@thekelleys.org.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:39:16 +0000 From: Simon Kelley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= References: <87a9e6xcae.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <87ob2lmqny.fsf@toke.dk> <52F29645.6010001@thekelleys.org.uk> <874n4dwcdb.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F2BA80.9010202@thekelleys.org.uk> <87iossvgw4.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F369AA.5060809@thekelleys.org.uk> <8761osv78r.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F371B3.5030406@thekelleys.org.uk> <87k3d8mna8.fsf@toke.dk> <52F3A3B2.8020201@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ppmw7ajj.fsf@toke.dk> <52F77349.40305@thekelleys.org.uk> <87lhxk78pa.fsf@toke.dk> <52F7EC3C.4060505@thekelleys.org.uk> <87bnyg55tp.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87bnyg55tp.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Testers wanted: DNSSEC. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:39:21 -0000 On 09/02/14 21:33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Simon Kelley writes: > >> It's possible, indeed that's happened during testing. Dave, could you >> talk me through getting the latest dnsmasq package on the 3800 you >> gave me? > > The packages I've built are here: > http://archive.tohojo.dk/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.28-4-tohojo/packages/ > > They're packaged as libhogweed, libnettle, libgmp and dnsmasq-dhcpv6 -- > dunno if they're installable without further ado on your box. But if so > you should be able to just download those four package files onto your > router (stick them in /tmp to avoid running out of flash) and calling > opkg to install them... Great, thanks. I've done that and confirmed what you are seeing. At this point I need to trace through the whole validation process in parallel on working and broken platforms, to see where the two diverge. (I've had to do this before. It was not fun, but it did produce results.) I've installed gdb and can run dnsmasq under gdb, but the binary is very thoroughly stripped, so I can't get any useful information out. Best way to get a non-stripped dnsmasq binary on there? Cheers, Simon.