From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eyas.biff.org.uk (eyas.biff.org.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:519c::20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F66321F20C for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from cl-1441.lon-02.gb.sixxs.net ([2a01:348:6:5a0::2]:48910 helo=central.thekelleys.org.uk) by eyas.biff.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCtzQ-00010I-MY; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:45:48 +0000 Received: from spike.thekelleys.org.uk ([192.168.0.193]) by central.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCtzP-0001LU-TQ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:45:47 +0000 Message-ID: <52F9023B.50504@thekelleys.org.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:45:47 +0000 From: Simon Kelley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= References: <87a9e6xcae.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <87ob2lmqny.fsf@toke.dk> <52F29645.6010001@thekelleys.org.uk> <874n4dwcdb.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F2BA80.9010202@thekelleys.org.uk> <87iossvgw4.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F369AA.5060809@thekelleys.org.uk> <8761osv78r.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> <52F371B3.5030406@thekelleys.org.uk> <87k3d8mna8.fsf@toke.dk> <52F3A3B2.8020201@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ppmw7ajj.fsf@toke.dk> <52F77349.40305@thekelleys.org.uk> <87lhxk78pa.fsf@toke.dk> <52F7EC3C.4060505@thekelleys.org.uk> <87bnyg55tp.fsf@toke.dk> <52F8BA64.2050401@thekelleys.org.uk> <871tzbgm36.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <871tzbgm36.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Testers wanted: DNSSEC. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:45:51 -0000 On 10/02/14 12:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Simon Kelley writes: > >> Great, thanks. I've done that and confirmed what you are seeing. At this point I >> need to trace through the whole validation process in parallel on working and >> broken platforms, to see where the two diverge. >> (I've had to do this before. It was not fun, but it did produce results.) I've >> installed gdb and can run dnsmasq under gdb, but the binary is very thoroughly >> stripped, so I can't get any useful information out. Best way to get a >> non-stripped dnsmasq binary on there? > > I've rebuilt the packages non-stripped; same links as before (warning, > they're quite big now) :) > OK. Fix (I think), in git now. Please could you test? (A byte-order problem, inevitably). Cheers, Simon.