From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7C321F1C1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f8so3085225wiw.1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:48:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type;
	bh=rPolmS6Rl6IiUQUxzhZlhRO6Z5pOGzvQLG5+KJ9C5qI=;
	b=n6CxiDkSgju5MmNUKGJf2FjeUb4H7Y7cQAkPlhl4jEuiCoV0HVyT427wstHurf3lKg
	xD8UN+2G1ioyhIcvUWSbW2muXaSzqAQhL3gGHeM95ylGeuemV8N+0ESl+89lpW/VprOs
	/FXxoxVDs3M8GeLX1lqztihhTVcE8RWOoAxvs0p3bPUmca9TuRain9bF6xebMcm9tdpX
	eFqcmP2/7tJ/HdHpXpXduCw91gARUGmvkqSzK0axoQ7pafoMf9E1k6Ufgenrd95+d1Dj
	ivIFAG3ic2wVHllq5ciwnid1rhM7llIuMPLxgpzEEXzUnSHR8PiWg9Xcb6kkcrYxuWbc
	0fRg==
X-Received: by 10.180.37.162 with SMTP id z2mr14408237wij.51.1393249701200;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:6aac:1:f07c:d650:105c:e6c9?
	([2001:470:6aac:1:f07c:d650:105c:e6c9])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm3sm24452460wib.8.2014.02.24.05.48.19
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530B4DA3.4080507@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:48:19 +0000
From: Robert Bradley <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vincent Frentzel <zcecc22@c3r.es>
References: <CACCCjEXdFP40pa_4L3gAK8kyCq_Qj2tZF-VEFqNGp9=jS4JpYg@mail.gmail.com>	<20140223172140.GB24483@lists.bufferbloat.net>	<530A4791.8080903@ashtonfam.org>	<CACCCjEXibgeepGo67ZSfx21NwRik8C+5x4Z5J7kroSGY1oPETA@mail.gmail.com>	<128185AE-918F-4944-BB45-B5D20A1AD1E5@gmx.de>	<CACCCjEVE+Un+M2vKm=SaHw-7-mPqVCByxZToQX-Xmz43j2YUYg@mail.gmail.com>	<530B1C8C.90100@imap.cc>	<530B2703.3000505@imap.cc>	<CACCCjEU+OY7qxNy8OqaqiRRDNHdV=q4sb2FW2-YsJGAzsVF2GQ@mail.gmail.com>	<530B3F03.4010208@imap.cc>	<530B4109.2060202@gmail.com>
	<CACCCjEVL2X9ux8O6m6G=mJWBGM4cae1y1jBYkZmveJiuBSj0jA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACCCjEVL2X9ux8O6m6G=mJWBGM4cae1y1jBYkZmveJiuBSj0jA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------090701040604080708040206"
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] saner defaults for config/firewall
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:48:23 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090701040604080708040206
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 24/02/2014 13:05, Vincent Frentzel wrote:
> Thanks Robert.
>
> I indeed had enable_vlan4k in the network. Will definitely try to
> remove this. When you enable the vlan do you use the eth0.1, eth0.2,
> etc.. stanza for the interface or se00? Is se00 an alias for eth0.1?
>
>

I'm open to corrections, but from what I have seen here the se00
interface in Luci maps to a physical se00 interface by default.  That
interface receives vlan tagged packets from the embedded switch which
then appear untagged on eth0.x.  With VLANs enabled you'd remap the Luci
"se00" from the raw se00 Ethernet interface to eth0.1 via the "Physical
Settings" tab for vlan 1 and create new interfaces in Luci for your new
vlans.


-- 
Robert Bradley


--------------090701040604080708040206
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/02/2014 13:05, Vincent Frentzel
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CACCCjEVL2X9ux8O6m6G=mJWBGM4cae1y1jBYkZmveJiuBSj0jA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Thanks Robert. <br>
          <br>
        </div>
        I indeed had enable_vlan4k in the network. Will definitely try
        to remove this. When you enable the vlan do you use the eth0.1,
        eth0.2, etc.. stanza for the interface or se00? Is se00 an alias
        for eth0.1?<br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I'm open to corrections, but from what I have seen here the se00
    interface in Luci maps to a physical se00 interface by default. 
    That interface receives vlan tagged packets from the embedded switch
    which then appear untagged on eth0.x.  With VLANs enabled you'd
    remap the Luci "se00" from the raw se00 Ethernet interface to eth0.1
    via the "Physical Settings" tab for vlan 1 and create new interfaces
    in Luci for your new vlans.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Robert Bradley</pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------090701040604080708040206--