From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <oliver.niesner@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AADF21F17D
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:14:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so511966wib.17
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:14:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=z1iYDpaXlkxzqQDMzcHASaYNudd4nSOuUu7njbGRWRc=;
	b=RYDvJhMtj0fOsYv3s4IFVBOING9DHHqnNMfhas5we2LSsjZ9AlhC2fCAMVVc0zxJKt
	SvUdfnF540OVAF5Jwi/cPAZF7X/GqQgV73t4eRox0PPF48RvFaBpmD3P4ZG59zKfKpGZ
	PzhvXnSY5QwW+aVSxIglYxrglykrRp9DSKc+CfgjOSIEqOeE/eV6vSHwFLbf5LQSWeog
	oZ1Y6FG+ddzPRdmvqwioMgW2QNzlosAvWvmukbvh8qyO5qU5jFgZafekeIUgmcPuikrZ
	IqfopjjLCEAzjUa3EgW/qSRCmZb5Y66RBNlw/v+E4kfG/qCtwwlhWiEl2vVj0uGtcz1K
	B7yA==
X-Received: by 10.194.236.9 with SMTP id uq9mr23701677wjc.31.1393326844093;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.30.43.67] (p4FFD4AEF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.253.74.239])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	l4sm40235476eeo.9.2014.02.25.03.14.03
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:14:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530C7AFA.2070101@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:14:02 +0100
From: Oliver Niesner <oliver.niesner@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] uplink_buffer_adjustment
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:14:09 -0000

Hi list,

I use cerowrt (3.10.24-8) direct behind my main dsl Router.
SQM is set and performance is good.
When i used Netalyzr from my smartphone i've got good results.

> Network buffer measurements (?): Uplink 96 ms, Downlink is good 

But when i use my notebook i get this:

> Network buffer measurements (?): Uplink 1200 ms, Downlink is good 

I tried even wired connection and set ring buffer rx/tx with ethtool to 64, but
only minimal change in uplink buffer (1100ms).

Has anyone an idea, what i can try to get better uplink performance?

Regards,

Oliver