Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-9 released

["Török Edwin" <edwin@etorok.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1357 bytes --]

On 03/18/2014 04:21 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Regrettably the SQM system on the wndr series of hardware maxes out on
> CPU at about 50Mbit down, 10Mbit up, or any combination thereof (e.g
> 25/25 works). If you want to apply this code at higher rates, routing
> hardware with more "oomph" is needed.
> 
> I would be interested in a rrul test of your 50Mbit system. My tests
> of verizon at 25/25 showed them well managed on the up, far less well
> managed on the down, so in your 50Mbit design you might want to merely
> control the down with SQM.

Host: Linux 3.14-rc5, AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor, cpufreq set to performance, cpb disabled
Router: NETGEAR WNDR3700v2, 3.10.32-9
Target: OpenBSD 5.4, QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6), 3300.54 MHz

Host <-> Router connected via gigabit ethernet.

I confirmed that my target can do >50Mbit to another server, netperf shows 128*10^6 bit/s / 108 * 10^6 bit/s.

SQM with link-layer none settings:
 * download speed: 46000 kbit/s, upload speed 50000 kbit/s (~95% of measured speed on ISP's speedtest site).
 * fq_codel (default)
 * simple.qos
 * link-layer: none
 * results: <sqm_on_none.png>

SQM off: <sqm_off.png>

SQM with overhead Ethernet overhead 30: <sqm-on-30.png>
SQM with overhead Ethernet overhead 22: <sqm-on-22.png>

Should I also run a rrul46/rrul46compete test?

Best regards,
--Edwin

[-- Attachment #2: sqm_on_22.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 266647 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: sqm_on_30.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 257373 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: sqm_on_none.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 253387 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: sqm_off.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 242595 bytes --]