From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk (bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:51:46b:feff:ff:fe00:3310]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF3221F1EE for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [31.119.104.57] (helo=[192.168.150.151]) by bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCaI-0005UY-Ou; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:39:07 +0000 Message-ID: <5330A5F7.4090906@thekelleys.org.uk> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:39:03 +0000 From: Simon Kelley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= References: <532DD9DD.8040301@thekelleys.org.uk> <871txut453.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <532DE7A8.3010504@thekelleys.org.uk> <87ppleroks.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87ppleroks.fsf@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] DNSSEC & NTP Bootstrapping X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:39:11 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/14 20:00, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Simon Kelley writes: > >> That would be possible: it would require care to make it work in >> the face of the system time being warped by NTP. Best way may be >> to use times() rather than time() > > Good point. Since the availability of reliable time is what we're > waiting for, perhaps a large jump in the system clock could be > taken to mean it has been achieved and taken as a signal to exit > the grace period? With a timer for the case where the time is > already accurate, of course. This would make it rather specific to > this use case, though... > It could be done, but I'm not sure it's very _nice_. What do people think? Cheers, Simon. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMwpfcACgkQKPyGmiibgrfPegCfevYPY/WPb4/3lAdGnsBsM0EP 1WMAoItzEy8tbZ6d5ayfnClSvjy51tFb =tL/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----