From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk (bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:51:46b:feff:ff:fe00:3310]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC7B21F1E9 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [31.119.104.57] (helo=[192.168.150.151]) by bytemark.thekelleys.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSDll-00060b-U1; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:55:02 +0000 Message-ID: <5330B7C2.9050407@thekelleys.org.uk> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:54:58 +0000 From: Simon Kelley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht References: <2e8d5147b9dca46745f1424074876118@core-hosting.net> <5330A9CF.7010208@thekelleys.org.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dnsmasq-discuss , Evan Hunt , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Dnsmasq-discuss] Stats improvement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:55:06 -0000 It would be very interesting to see the differences between dnsmasq without DNSSEC, with DNSSEC and with DNSSEC and --dnssec-check-unsigned Cheers, Simon. On 24/03/14 22:50, Dave Taht wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> I would certainly like to have a standard way of getting these >> statistics, through the dns, perhaps one unified with whatever bind >> and unbound use (or don't use.) >> >> Not a lot of people seem to be aware of why dns caching forwarders are >> so great, although benchmarks like namebench against your chrome or >> firefox cache are quite revealing, parsing huge network captures as >> I am presently to try to get a grip on timings for dns/response >> pairing is a pita and not router centric. >> >> However: >> >> Do check out namebench, it's pretty cool. It does bug me that in tests >> against the alexa top 2000 that it invariably selects some other dns >> server besides your local one as being the "best", because it has >> the best average - as if you regularly go to websites in timbuktu and >> care about the response time more than, say, google. >> >> Example against alexa top 2000 with a fresh cache: >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/namebench/namebench_2014-03-20_1255.html >> >> It is much better to test against your more common query set, which I >> don't have a snapshot of on that site presently - usually 40% or more >> of queries are resolved in a ms, 30% or so via your ISP in under 20ms. >> >> I'd love to see people posting namebench results from against their >> firefox/chrome caches... it's in apt on ubuntu at least.... >> >> the version I have is buggy, you have to hit control-C at least once >> for the gui to come up. > > > I just did a namebench test against my local firefox cache (without clearing > dnsmasq's caches) > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/namebench/namebench_2014-03-24_1541.html > > note that I have three dns servers in place - one on my local machine, > a dnsmasq locally that is sending stuff over ipv6 to another dnsmasq > which is then connected over ipv4 and ipv6 to comcasts forwarders. > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: >>> On 24/03/14 11:25, Olivier Mauras wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I was wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd >>>> actually be any interest for some dnsmasq statistics improvements. (Yes >>>> i'm splitting dicussions ^^) >>>> For monitoring/graph purposes, actual >>>> dnsmasq stats are a bit difficult to use and completely unusable if >>>> using "log_queries" as it takes too long to retrieve them inside >>>> logs. >>>> >>>> I'd love to see a stats "interface" that would output >>>> total_queries, cache_hits, cache_misses, memory used by cache, >>>> etc.... >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Olivier >>>> >>> >>> There's an idea to make this available as a DNS query, in the same way that >>> >>> >>> dig chaos txt version.bind >>> >>> returns the version number. >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Simon. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list >>> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk >>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > > >