From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx.etorok.net (mx.etorok.net [IPv6:2a00:f48:1029::1:1a2:82ea]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.etorok.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5758F21F1A8 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 01:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mx.etorok.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 112b9f84; for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:13:30 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=etorok.net; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=ml; l=121; bh=WxgfwVOgDf+yQX2iL9zo BZdMTzQ=; b=Vn7SK2+7B/5X/zAWOUC+adpqFX6Gm8zJGJenHoEpAg5cIVziE3kP 7s/qJW8gHgxyWsvYs4NAuHZvgEx2W1zF+RQg1zbnnf9wQ2zGLhvhygSHlGlq6WPO uIY+gok3/xnL9PrHdJQZnPa4/UqK9++S3ldYBgPxB6b7g05MJbwHm9k= Received: by mx.etorok.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bc86fafd; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO; for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:13:30 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <533A7529.5020001@etorok.net> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:13:29 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] byte queue limits? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 08:13:38 -0000 Hi, Is setting byte_queue_limits not needed anymore? The sqm-scripts don't seem to set it. Best regards, --Edwin