From: "Török Edwin" <edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] test-ipv6.com vs dnssec
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:24:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535AB657.50906@etorok.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGhGL2CGVDoMoQxyRKoPV2zM42wYA3XT22w5DDrLVppjEg23bg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/25/2014 09:01 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> More specifically, after boot, most of the time test-ipv6.com <http://test-ipv6.com> reports lots of problems.
>
> Then I turned off both dnssec and dnssec-check-unsigned, and restarted dnsmasq; clean bill of health from test-ipv6.com <http://test-ipv6.com>.
>
>
> So we seem to have a boot time race of some sort.
There is definitely something wrong when ipv6 is enabled (I just noticed that since my latest upgrade I forgot to enable it).
When I enable ipv6 for PPPoE, then IPv6 works in the sense I can ping6 stuff from the router ... except IPv4 is completely broken: there is no default route added according to 'ip route show',
and even if I add a default route machines from LAN still can't reach IPv4 (presumably firewall would need to be reloaded too?).
It doesn't seem to be dnssec related, as even if I turn both dnssec and dnssec-check-unsigned off the behaviour is still the same.
I haven't investigated more deeply whats wrong yet. Do you think it could be related to your race condition?
> Then I turned on dnssec only, leaving dnssec-check-unsigned, and got a clean bill of health.
I've been using this for a while, it gets me a 0/10 score, i.e. ipv4 works, ipv6 fails, dual stack works with ipv4.
>
> Then I turned on both at the same time, and things are working.
With both on I get a 'n/a' as a result, saying that dual-stack lookups timed out, presumably because ipv6 is off see below.
Best regards,
--Edwin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 17:39 Dave Taht
2014-04-25 18:01 ` Jim Gettys
2014-04-25 18:45 ` James Cloos
2014-04-25 18:49 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Dnsmasq-discuss] " Simon Kelley
2014-04-25 19:43 ` Török Edwin
2014-04-25 19:48 ` Török Edwin
2014-04-28 19:07 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-28 19:57 ` James Cloos
2014-04-28 20:17 ` Török Edwin
2014-04-30 21:44 ` James Cloos
2014-04-25 19:24 ` Török Edwin [this message]
2014-04-25 19:42 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2014-04-26 19:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-04-27 16:15 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-27 19:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535AB657.50906@etorok.net \
--to=edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox