Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] fq_codel is two years old

[Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>]

Gosh, that's high praise. And what's really neat is that this was such a
team effort
where we don't even necessarily know each other! What's perhaps bad is that
this was a "volunteer" effort, though that also is a strength. I'm not
sure the
answer is for everyone to work for Google.

On 5/15/14 6:47 AM, dpreed@reed.com wrote:
...
> 
> The solution du jour is to leave bufferbloat in place, while using the
> real fads: prioritization (diffserv once we have the "fast lanes" fully
> legal) and "software defined networking" appliances that use DPI for
> packet routing and traffic management.
>

I think diffserv could be used for good instead of evil.

>  
> 
> Fixing buffer bloat allows the edge- and enterprise- networks to be more
> efficient, whereas not fixing it lets the edge networks move users up to
> more and more expensive "plans" due to frustration and to sell much more
> gear into Enterprises because they are easy marks for complex gadgets.
> 
>  

The above is exactly what Van told me when he was trying to get me to
"paint the fence" of working on aqm again. (That volunteer effort again:
his employer at that time was not paying him to do this sort of thing, so
he had to interest someone to work with him.) I hope you people with big
platforms will continue to try to educate folks.

	Kathie