From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C336421F336 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id cm18so7374621qab.14 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wCS9MzqUWk5zRgKvKWaYT1ozkBUJfw0pbxJgI9MFaIA=; b=s4Xl+ts2cVGViJq+bOTe0wjUnWOoc/UrlLmF6P4T0OBohSYS4TvwVVZTg/1FIH2LwS vzMuy487o/FdBNJ+TMB3TdZFwx8ZgW7vz+hYA4y1XqSQasrFfihAJmUktd/GhnauziwE mCdEgt4blUyTBnGvstqjNnzT1F9FoHGXvs3WoVJcm1ZN0sXXtiwq68kN5N4nWfw4CVDE iEzAtBbE9MRkMu3witunhECn9Yx4nPkOWmCB83zXlo1QJw4OLNGouvOriBScNskA1XOC TrwMDDOw1FUBFhxuxJArLuecsGwTpMTQ0wE1cZB7ecPjKosu8lvo5PkDSe5zEZZhzt4n RYTA== X-Received: by 10.140.24.243 with SMTP id 106mr20434651qgr.11.1405005519814; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from williamovna.rutgers.edu ([198.151.130.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m92sm35463517qgd.29.2014.07.10.08.18.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53BEAF05.8000601@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:19:33 -0400 From: William Katsak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Wood References: <53BEA813.8000108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Upper routing throughput limit X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:18:42 -0000 This is what I was afraid of. I'm on an older firmware still, so I will upgrade and do some testing (have to find time when family doesn't need Internet :) ). I was considering the possibility of using PfSense on an x86 box as my main router/firewall for better throughput, and hanging Cero off of that for wifi. Anyone doing something similar? If so, how do you organize the subnets? -Bill On 07/10/2014 11:01 AM, Aaron Wood wrote: > It depends on the aqm rules that are configured. In the base setup, it > struggles at 50Mbps. But that can be increased by switching from the > simple.qos script to simplest.qos (I'm not sure where the limit is with > the simplest.qos script. > > I know that Dave Taht has been working with some other platforms. The > Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite may be able to hit 100Mbps, but it doesn't run > CeroWRT itself, it just supports similar configuration. > > -Aaron > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, William Katsak > wrote: > > Hello, > > Does anyone have a good sense of the most throughput our 3800s with > Cero can push through the WAN interface? Are we good to 100 mbps? 1gbps? > > Thanks, > Bill Katsak > _________________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.__bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/__listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > >