From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A214A21F098 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail247-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.237) by TX2EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.9.40.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:34:04 +0000 Received: from mail247-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail247-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899851040144 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:34:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.244.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: VPS-2(zz1432I4015Izz1202hzz8275chz31h2a8h668h839h946hd25he5bhf0ah107ah) Received-SPF: softfail (mail247-tx2: transitioning domain of dartware.com does not designate 157.56.244.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.244.213; envelope-from=richard.e.brown@dartware.com; helo=CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook Received: from mail247-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail247-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1343039640968589_12752; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.250]) by mail247-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6DD1640049 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.213) by TX2EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (10.9.99.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:34:01 +0000 Received: from CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.220]) by CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.150.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0175.005; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:33:59 +0000 From: Richard Brown To: "" Thread-Topic: [Cerowrt-devel] Strange auto configured DNS address Thread-Index: AQHNaL6raKFeA1ofiUOP9HKtrr3bMQ== Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:33:58 +0000 Message-ID: <53DDF650-0FC7-471E-B9E3-F4BA3D982EA3@intermapper.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.150.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <7B0B61198D9A634FBF1A3B1BD0AAF448@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: dartware.com Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Strange auto configured DNS address X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:34:05 -0000 Hi Bill, It's nice to have you on the list. I wrote the entry in the Wiki, and have = tested the script with CeroWrt 3.3.8-6 (19 June 2012). I had some troubles = with the later 3.3.8 versions, so I dropped back 10 and punted.=20 I haven't seen the problem you mention, so I have a couple questions: - What version of CeroWrt are you using? - What version of OS X do you have (I'm running 10.6.8, and cannot comment = on newer versions.)=20 Thanks. Rich Brown Hanover, NH USA > I am new to the list and CeroWrt, but have been playing around quite a bi= t lately and am finding the project very interesting. >=20 > I am seeing a very strange phenomenon with my Mac machine using CeroWrt. = I have an he.net /48 set up on the router following the instructions on the= wiki=85this works fine. However, when I turn on IPV6 on my Mac, it picks u= p two DNS addresses: the cero router IPV4 address, and for some reason, the= link-local address that is shared by se00 and sw00. This address is not ro= utable from the Mac, so the machine randomly hangs on name resolution becau= se it sometimes tries to hit that address. >=20 > Obviously, I can fix this by forcing that address out of the resolver lis= t, but I was just wondering if anyone else has seen this and/or can explain= it. >=20 > Thanks, > Bill Katsak