From: William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Upper routing throughput limit
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:35:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E2839D.8090304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-NxmmdARW_wJApm_r_JH-kjRF3K5=EdpZe+qyJkHY7DUg@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry to wake this thread up again. It does indeed seem that the 3800 is
having trouble routing at my line speed.
I was considering doing a pfSense box, but it doesn't seem that
Bufferbloat has been much of a consideration yet over there. There is a
version of Codel, but the QoS would have to be set up manually.
I've Googled this Ubiquiti Edgerouter Lite, and I am intrigued. I don't
see many details on Ubiquiti's site about the QoS though. Is this device
as good at beating bloat as Cero? Would mating one of these with a 3800
(for Wifi only) be a good bet?
Thanks,
-Bill
On 07/10/2014 11:01 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> It depends on the aqm rules that are configured. In the base setup, it
> struggles at 50Mbps. But that can be increased by switching from the
> simple.qos script to simplest.qos (I'm not sure where the limit is with
> the simplest.qos script.
>
> I know that Dave Taht has been working with some other platforms. The
> Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite may be able to hit 100Mbps, but it doesn't run
> CeroWRT itself, it just supports similar configuration.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com
> <mailto:wkatsak@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have a good sense of the most throughput our 3800s with
> Cero can push through the WAN interface? Are we good to 100 mbps? 1gbps?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill Katsak
> _________________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.__bufferbloat.net
> <mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/__listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 14:49 William Katsak
2014-07-10 15:01 ` Aaron Wood
2014-07-10 15:19 ` William Katsak
2014-07-11 9:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
[not found] ` <3FF07025-9AE2-4A6F-9E7B-A0AC5CAFD290@gmail.com>
2014-08-09 18:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-08-06 19:35 ` William Katsak [this message]
2014-08-06 23:06 ` David Lang
2014-08-06 23:10 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E2839D.8090304@gmail.com \
--to=wkatsak@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox