Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Upper routing throughput limit
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:35:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E2839D.8090304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-NxmmdARW_wJApm_r_JH-kjRF3K5=EdpZe+qyJkHY7DUg@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry to wake this thread up again. It does indeed seem that the 3800 is 
having trouble routing at my line speed.

I was considering doing a pfSense box, but it doesn't seem that 
Bufferbloat has been much of a consideration yet over there. There is a 
version of Codel, but the QoS would have to be set up manually.

I've Googled this Ubiquiti Edgerouter Lite, and I am intrigued. I don't 
see many details on Ubiquiti's site about the QoS though. Is this device 
as good at beating bloat as Cero? Would mating one of these with a 3800 
(for Wifi only) be a good bet?

Thanks,
-Bill


On 07/10/2014 11:01 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> It depends on the aqm rules that are configured.  In the base setup, it
> struggles at 50Mbps.  But that can be increased by switching from the
> simple.qos script to simplest.qos (I'm not sure where the limit is with
> the simplest.qos script.
>
> I know that Dave Taht has been working with some other platforms.  The
> Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite may be able to hit 100Mbps, but it doesn't run
> CeroWRT itself, it just supports similar configuration.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com
> <mailto:wkatsak@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     Does anyone have a good sense of the most throughput our 3800s with
>     Cero can push through the WAN interface? Are we good to 100 mbps? 1gbps?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Bill Katsak
>     _________________________________________________
>     Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>     Cerowrt-devel@lists.__bufferbloat.net
>     <mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/__listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>     <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>
>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-10 14:49 William Katsak
2014-07-10 15:01 ` Aaron Wood
2014-07-10 15:19   ` William Katsak
2014-07-11  9:33     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
     [not found]       ` <3FF07025-9AE2-4A6F-9E7B-A0AC5CAFD290@gmail.com>
2014-08-09 18:52         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-08-06 19:35   ` William Katsak [this message]
2014-08-06 23:06     ` David Lang
2014-08-06 23:10       ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E2839D.8090304@gmail.com \
    --to=wkatsak@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox