From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wkatsak@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B2721F626
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed,  6 Aug 2014 13:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j5so3366948qga.29
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=/SQuC4JW138N+0Wd/hbagVfP5t51Ee3wbDgjcI3Q5Uw=;
	b=bA+bcoSR7/Wfm6GPZCsfNOzNRtrbC5N1qxonyQ1k5jXUiNHNtkHA4Sz0tfc+k2e0lm
	n5wZZiypdS+G9fyinH/lx6gQ9KYCDqzSFejfy3zw4/dsu3RbzqPVptp0cJM6WjCDHoIy
	XB93YeW+ulVAzekwaM9841Tj6Vuri40st8jlClIyI1tx/cuMxZPbVTS5F2TC9RyGQTO/
	7nm2CPBYChL67drnbHImaTjcLQTVYWD6o5x5bTMMEIL0Ukb3ulroMw6Ncy96HK95iebV
	shQkGT05UJ+lsv2I80wfvSqFROyi1HaxOiuGulZpndTfhzUQ6ERidRZ9TWLSFdPpUB07
	7bBA==
X-Received: by 10.229.74.74 with SMTP id t10mr20555055qcj.12.1407356425394;
	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from williamovna.rutgers.edu ([198.151.130.137])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm3285651qar.29.2014.08.06.13.20.25
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53E28E48.3000601@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:21:28 -0400
From: William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] High speed routing / Ubiquiti
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:20:26 -0000

Hello,

I tried to reply to an earlier thread on this topic, but it didn't seem 
to post. I apologize if this double-posts.

Background: I have a 105/35 cable link and the 3800 with Cero can't keep up.

I was considering doing a pfSense box, but it doesn't seem that 
Bufferbloat has been much of a consideration yet over there. There is a 
version of Codel, but the QoS would have to be set up manually.

I've Googled this Ubiquiti Edgerouter Lite, and I am intrigued. I don't 
see many details on Ubiquiti's site about the QoS though. Is this device 
as good at beating bloat as Cero? Would mating one of these with a 3800 
(for Wifi only) be a good bet?

Thanks,
-Bill