From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from z.eggo.org (z.eggo.org [80.235.105.138]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9208C21F20A for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D163C377F for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:55:08 +0300 (EEST) Received: from z.eggo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z.eggo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ZfiAha18zITX for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:55:03 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7583C36F3 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:55:02 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harvee.org Received: from z.eggo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z.eggo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sNPLS0pulDrH for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:55:02 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [10.43.6.113] (173-14-129-9-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.14.129.9]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83AE13C3342 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:55:02 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <54233DB3.4020602@eggo.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:54:59 -0400 From: "Eric S. Johansson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] bash exploit heads up X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:55:40 -0000 On 9/24/2014 5:45 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > shows vulnerable for bash, not sh, on openwrt and cerowrt. That said, > it makes me nervous. I've never really liked the redir.sh method cero > uses to bounce people to the right web interface... suggestions to do > it in javascript or something safer desired. > http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/reback I'll take a look in the next couple of days if no one beats me to it.