From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3C421F3DF for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n8so196432qaq.14 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:58:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iSXCQsnABqIAb/mPPm82KYdLXrBOhv2xinqJ9k1hULo=; b=g+sTQN6jHC5Ix7z4vbDxsHchech93S6DoBN/O2QpCsUJa6qk/exHqkSxWymCQe20kM MG9pyndWOs033yT2xUqTB3WFC0tx4wH+IiY3m3e3qZQaO98nswP6B0x1Inr/PupdSze5 PRA3WJGPcc2J6hIdzZCqFRmLBSu2Lwj/L8U5nMziUxU4oxiZ3YTe6RqyImfcQynWLA2F F/59QqF8CfiJ04y41hLnniFtEvnNd45yP+fQieKVrUps8FNF33Ps0b9BzJyIRCHsqi7o V6KH+qbQHc0DOLefPGYtpvlEfe9U/tK0ww074YfCUKMc5sd1JcJSzhSDamHMC6V5f+2J 3DXQ== X-Received: by 10.140.96.132 with SMTP id k4mr671905qge.37.1412297887397; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.30.55.5] (ool-2f10b31b.dyn.optonline.net. [47.16.179.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm4598233qaw.6.2014.10.02.17.58.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <542DF493.80504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 20:57:55 -0400 From: William Katsak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:58:37 -0000 Do you have a working x86 build for Cero again? Or just playing with a workstation? -Bill On 10/02/2014 07:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > Oh, no, that's an x86 result. It's barely a blip on that cpu use though, so I am > encouraged so far. Haven't got around to porting it to mips, too many > non-working ideas elsewhere in it, ENOTIME. -- **************************************** William Katsak ****************************************