Re: [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow

["Richard A. Smith" <richard@laptop.org>]

On 10/02/2014 07:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote:

>> I beleive that on the WNDR3800, it's able to work up to about 50Mb with the
>> existing configurations. A faster CPU would do better, a slower one worse.
>
> Actually it appears that cache is very important on fixing inbound rate shaping.
>
> The octeon in the edgerouter lite peaks out at above 60mbits also, but the
> bigger, fatter pro product actually manages quite a bit better (with increasing
> inaccuracy however). See below...

Ugh.  Got any hard numbers on the top speed of the edgerouter with shaping?

At work we recently upgraded our link from 60/10 to 100/15 and the WNDR 
I have running the show can no longer keep up.  I've been looking for a 
replacement and the edgerouter lite was looking like a possibility.

I tried to use a TPLink AC1750 thinking that a newer setup with a faster 
cpu might be able to keep up.  If I don't have shaping enabled it can do 
200+ Mbit but with shaping it drops considerably.  It's still faster 
than the WNDR but seems to max out at about 85 Mbit.

-- 
Richard A. Smith  <richard@laptop.org>
Former One Laptop per Child