Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard A. Smith" <richard@laptop.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 22:16:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5431FB6D.8090005@laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5JS7WpAzxSnbwWyR+10Bwmrga0O2V2SgbEvwgHduUFeA@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/05/2014 01:57 PM, Dave Taht wrote:

>> Ugh.  Got any hard numbers on the top speed of the edgerouter with shaping?
>>
>> At work we recently upgraded our link from 60/10 to 100/15 and the WNDR I
>> have running the show can no longer keep up.  I've been looking for a
>> replacement and the edgerouter lite was looking like a possibility.
>
> Shaping the uplink only still helps a lot.

Hmmm... At work I use OpenWRT barrier breaker and not ceroWRT.
I'm just using the stock qos script and luci.  How would I go about 
setting it to only do uplink?

> is basically fq_codel, near as I can tell. I'll try pushing it to
> 120Mbit this week.

Thanks.  That would be very helpful. If it works I'll get one.

We need QoS for our VoIP system.  If I don't run QoS the VoIP system is 
very unhappy.


> I do not have a high impression of it's overall firmware quality, and
> haven't seen the gpl drop yet.

There several pages that say its based on OpenWRT?  But I don't see any 
mention of that on OpenWRT page website and searches for r7500 or AC2350 
  or nighthawk don't seem to turn up anything.  Just a few hits for the 
r7000 and that the radio is not supported.

> Aside from that, there's always x86.

Yeah. That was going to be my fall back option if the edgerouter did not 
work.

I was thinking about getting one of these:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856205007

and running OpenWRT x86 on it.

-- 
Richard A. Smith  <richard@laptop.org>
Former One Laptop per Child

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-06  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-02 23:07 Dave Taht
2014-10-03  0:57 ` William Katsak
2014-10-03  1:26   ` Dave Taht
2014-10-03 18:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-05 16:26 ` Richard A. Smith
2014-10-05 17:57   ` Dave Taht
2014-10-06  2:16     ` Richard A. Smith [this message]
2014-10-06  2:37       ` Richard A. Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5431FB6D.8090005@laptop.org \
    --to=richard@laptop.org \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox