From: "Richard A. Smith" <richard@laptop.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 22:16:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5431FB6D.8090005@laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5JS7WpAzxSnbwWyR+10Bwmrga0O2V2SgbEvwgHduUFeA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/05/2014 01:57 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Ugh. Got any hard numbers on the top speed of the edgerouter with shaping?
>>
>> At work we recently upgraded our link from 60/10 to 100/15 and the WNDR I
>> have running the show can no longer keep up. I've been looking for a
>> replacement and the edgerouter lite was looking like a possibility.
>
> Shaping the uplink only still helps a lot.
Hmmm... At work I use OpenWRT barrier breaker and not ceroWRT.
I'm just using the stock qos script and luci. How would I go about
setting it to only do uplink?
> is basically fq_codel, near as I can tell. I'll try pushing it to
> 120Mbit this week.
Thanks. That would be very helpful. If it works I'll get one.
We need QoS for our VoIP system. If I don't run QoS the VoIP system is
very unhappy.
> I do not have a high impression of it's overall firmware quality, and
> haven't seen the gpl drop yet.
There several pages that say its based on OpenWRT? But I don't see any
mention of that on OpenWRT page website and searches for r7500 or AC2350
or nighthawk don't seem to turn up anything. Just a few hits for the
r7000 and that the radio is not supported.
> Aside from that, there's always x86.
Yeah. That was going to be my fall back option if the edgerouter did not
work.
I was thinking about getting one of these:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856205007
and running OpenWRT x86 on it.
--
Richard A. Smith <richard@laptop.org>
Former One Laptop per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 23:07 Dave Taht
2014-10-03 0:57 ` William Katsak
2014-10-03 1:26 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-03 18:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-05 16:26 ` Richard A. Smith
2014-10-05 17:57 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-06 2:16 ` Richard A. Smith [this message]
2014-10-06 2:37 ` Richard A. Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5431FB6D.8090005@laptop.org \
--to=richard@laptop.org \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox