Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

["Richard A. Smith" <richard@laptop.org>]

On 10/02/2014 10:05 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:

> 	I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are equal (pretty much the same kernel and most of the cerowrt guts are from openwrt bb trunk). But I have not tested that (I have only one cerowrt/openwrt capable router and that pretty much is my main router).
> 	If you are talking about comparing QOS-scripts with SQM-scripts, they also seem to top out at roughly 50-60 Mbps (down- and uplink combined), it seems hfsc (qos-scripts) and HTB (sam-scripts) are equally expensive on MIPS.
> 	Now if you are setup to do tests yourself I would love to hear the results. I would be happy to help you getting SQM-scripts to work (so far all people interested disappeared before or just after sharing initial test results).

Do you still need testers?  I have a bit of an interest here.

I have spare routers that I can run OpenWRT or CeroWRt on and I'm setup 
to test with netperf, netperf-wrapper on my local network
  ( desktop -> router -> laptop )  it's Gbit so I can easily saturate 
the router.

What I don't have is a lot of time but I can do a few runs in the 
evenings or on weekends.  I also am very out of touch with the latest 
and greatest QoS vs SQM development and configuration so you will have 
to feed me test recipes.

-- 
Richard A. Smith  <richard@laptop.org>
Former One Laptop per Child