From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9971821F390 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id m20so564067qcx.33 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:09:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BWy9uWSQMWxY/yyjCf2XHyTb6qqpE1SUkP2n9fM6orA=; b=XMPH0i3Dq2xgmO+F6KhlThERYG4CCuJYy+07bEz/3NyqjwKtiNqXY8anZTbpkBbltJ kFTVTD6+uJQF3P6BFspy6fcVhynsogGfKhleiu1OOTL+g7CTCZz9zCh+jPEgbd7Xz1GT HAZE0PCC5CHQP7cTkj4qSBv1OU8Ug0yGRSZXwxc4ZcN5e447F8AZ2gEcoaFPqQvtc2fs wyePMQH0kDv1BkaxDlkdTbe5qxf0S9+xHmRa7iqTlKBTw9zfvqs5OuAarFVoi3+ZCjMr YAUg4hEK0xXeO43Et55CHYQkitDdxzDk+1EiRAaiE9cqANuYJG/rfCRATBWUj//CcEnE /nzg== X-Received: by 10.140.109.52 with SMTP id k49mr38810490qgf.96.1412874554063; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.206] (207-180-163-170.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.180.163.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm2848927qac.18.2014.10.09.10.09.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 10:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5436C137.8070706@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:09:11 -0400 From: Richard Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , Hannu Nyman References: <20141002014914.GA12656@lists.bufferbloat.net> <54359A46.8000107@iki.fi> <20141009030125.GA19113@lists.bufferbloat.net> In-Reply-To: <20141009030125.GA19113@lists.bufferbloat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: OpenWrt Development List , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:09:44 -0000 On 10/08/2014 11:01 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > Excellent. I'd *really* like to get some testers doing ingress shaping > at above 60-80mbits, which seems to be a brick wall we've hit on > the ar71xx and octeon, on other platforms like the arm and x86. I can do ingress shaping tests at above 80mbits at work since we now have a 100mbit downlink, but I don't have cerowrt hardware that runs fast enough to keep up. Also I would only be able to do them on the weekend or late at night when no one else is in the office when I can swap out the router. I can't leave experimental setups alone running our office link. FYI: I've purchased a Nighthawk x6 for some testing. I did x6 even though its CPU speed is slower than the x4 because I want to see if the twin 5Ghz radios and the promise of automatic load balancing helps on the wireless side (we have a lot of 5Ghz wireless clients) If it doesn't hold up as a router we may still use it as just an AP. Like you mentioned the stock firmware is not the greatest and there's no actual bandwidth control settings. Hopefully openwrt support will show up soon. My initial tests with Gbit pipes on either side are certainly impressive as it can route at over 900 Mbs while keeping latency at 12ms or lower. Tonight I'm planning on testing it with my home Comcast cable link and see if the low-latency holds. -- Richard A. Smith