From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx.etorok.net (mx.etorok.net [62.113.205.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.etorok.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE3D21F34B for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mx.etorok.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1e716260; for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:02:21 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=etorok.net; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=ml; l=913; bh=Ov2RKvQ tfIaJDZ+i8RxwMbO/Mwg=; b=Vwbo6Xg+VUYDW0dAk4f1g5jEtzTLtq7RtPyFZOj Sczd756HAS1VcSGqBLbkIGlS+IzprjK160uknpUpRQGlHvOcYNVdB19QNk+C6rgx LkM7pgUP3Cv/fsZgVJc2wgQxqSjaGMhfZvl4UwD6O/u4MmMz1TR3tepmOmW4mJKj Evsc= Received: by mx.etorok.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 878c0a1f; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:02:21 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <543E624C.8070304@etorok.net> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:02:20 +0300 From: =?windows-1252?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <1895D16A-1B0F-48C7-B4B5-6FC84CA92F43@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <1895D16A-1B0F-48C7-B4B5-6FC84CA92F43@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and PPPoE, more questions than answers... X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:02:53 -0000 On 10/15/2014 03:03 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > I guess it is back to the drawing board to figure out how to speed up the classification… and then revisit the PPPoE question again… FWIW I had to add this to /etc/config/network (done via luci actually): option keepalive '500 30' Otherwise it uses these default values from /etc/ppp/options, and then I hit: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7793: lcp-echo-failure 5 lcp-echo-interval 1 The symptomps are that if I start a large download after half a minute or so pppd complains that it didn't receive reply to 5 LCP echo packets and disconnects/reconnects. Sounds like the LCP echo/reply packets should get prioritized, but I don't know if it is my router that is dropping them or my ISP. When you tested PPPoE did you notice pppd dropping the connection and restarting, cause that would affect the timings for sure... Best regards, --Edwin