From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A836A21F1AA for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail208-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.235) by CH1EHSOBE011.bigfish.com (10.43.70.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:23 +0000 Received: from mail208-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail208-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76AD48016C; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.244.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -1 X-BigFish: VPS-1(zzc85dh111aIzz1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah18c673h172d07h8275bhz31h2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail208-ch1: transitioning domain of intermapper.com does not designate 157.56.244.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.244.213; envelope-from=Rich.Brown@intermapper.com; helo=CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail208-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail208-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 135852440160428_8968; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.253]) by mail208-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ADE4C0072; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.213) by CH1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (10.43.70.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:20 +0000 Received: from CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.154]) by CH1PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.150.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0257.004; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:20 +0000 From: Richard Brown To: Dave Taht Thread-Topic: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.7.2-3 released, still in a battle with ipv6 Thread-Index: AQHN9ZAuxS3NaNWY3kKpgeCVJ9PO0ZhPPMIA Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:20 +0000 Message-ID: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADB172@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADA4D5@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.150.4] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADB172CH1PRD0510MB381_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: intermapper.com Cc: Richard Brown , "" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.7.2-3 released, still in a battle with ipv6 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:53:25 -0000 --_000_54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADB172CH1PRD0510MB381_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave, There are multiple threads on the stateless dhcp and dhcp implementation go= ing on here: http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q1/thread.html among other things, "enable-ra" should be getting set in the generated dnsm= asq conf file and probably isn't right now. Perhaps it can be manually set? OK. I'll check that list. I'm hoping ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really wasn't = planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO care about ex= ercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are still a few = new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 419) (dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assign the delegated prefix) ipv6 isn't critical for me - I'm just doing my walk around to see if things= are still working. (And it sounds as if you're going to keep after IPv6 fo= r a while.) Thanks again for all this work! Rich --_000_54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADB172CH1PRD0510MB381_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <82F0215157AC4B419F26A3F13F4BB74C@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave,

There are multiple threads on the stateless dhcp and dhcp implementation going o= n here:


among other things, "enable-ra" should be getting set in the gene= rated dnsmasq conf file and probably isn't right now. Perhaps it can be man= ually set? 

OK. I'll check that list.

I'm hoping ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really wasn't = planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO care about ex= ercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are still a few = new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 419)

(dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assign the delegated prefix)<= /div>

ipv6 isn't critical for me - I'm just doing my walk around to see if t= hings are still working. (And it sounds as if you're going to keep after IP= v6 for a while.)

Thanks again for all this work!

Rich
--_000_54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADB172CH1PRD0510MB381_--