From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B830221F55E for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lfbn126 with SMTP id n126so76627744lfb.2 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uUzp3TJo+OLQ+BRIImyxoPsHOICteDthNdoY6FF/i9s=; b=GmHlITUDqyCAvxYFacw6YrFgtSWitTKSKj4XJ4npo/NP2OQia4JITpDYMHr/P7NNsK lY+PC2D2Rvk0h9lKwkFSMG5BcderkWJ8hWDLKFl3EzFHWJY2SJRKs+DxtNiyPkndaDw9 u9N97mh62wyrLr8r6pbCVD90Pq2XYlRqpnbdrEkeBluc/O9K1WeFC7FCUQZ4Uq1+XVQB dS62iZyRng+MhO9AH1S2MJn6ZyuZadOIKqyL6yXXCVqRMrB0YLGqkd2t0lB7QLHfealX xQYHfOgTdaObb1Ej6eoiRjFSjZzPtswf3zvuB7CMtyXA6MrNdQFbXvmhrCP/7R/5w4Cn qRyQ== X-Received: by 10.112.145.232 with SMTP id sx8mr13532956lbb.4.1445705575132; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (83-245-234-242-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.234.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1sm4385476lfe.23.2015.10.24.09.52.53 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Jonathan Morton X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <931be41d-68b7-4fea-9d4e-14bf1636e9bc@reed.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:52:47 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <545AA548-7012-4BFF-A177-3F68EB6D78D6@gmail.com> References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <12883.1445625688@sandelman.ca> <562A9611.4050403@gmail.com> <931be41d-68b7-4fea-9d4e-14bf1636e9bc@reed.com> To: "David P. Reed" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 16:53:20 -0000 > On 24 Oct, 2015, at 19:34, David P. Reed wrote: >=20 > Not trying to haggle. Just pointing out that this test configuration = has a very short RTT. maybe too short for our SQM to adjust to. It should still get the bandwidth right. When it does, we=E2=80=99ll = know that the setup is correct. - Jonathan Morton