From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0F121F1A0
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h11so6472882wiw.3
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:03:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=2bCsUc+UQ72zwf1Z/bVIrIslTxfFJTh7nXaRaB73TWE=;
	b=bN6JJPCbTYZ5ftydKI8BANDRHNQdfu4890Jbx8AHzirUyxvcx2Bffl7O9299veSXr/
	U+NGGxRd80I9v/TaYT9H4koCHLx7taGBlBxCMK4WfRHYVvmptdFk145/9kWO2alFMfx0
	2fAYrqsbnwdTB5Gw7+E+PJPf/SCMBu2lsaFSLqmXQyKkVLsXD2972W1d85fK4P/yYfHF
	njolI8W7qlc+y+ZRZdv72rcohQcLBoIXcyY+Ach0wqI54J0Sr1gpy2ZPcWZ8r4ydVdPH
	eJfNExhIZfY6hnuJQDr91xc6xX43WAYgZdufBIIFf5Mhh0VizXSUAH8I1lfQsviC8u+C
	XFxw==
X-Received: by 10.180.108.35 with SMTP id hh3mr44364942wib.59.1417039412077;
	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.8]
	(cpc69387-oxfd28-2-0-cust914.4-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.16.135.147])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	r10sm22607720wiy.13.2014.11.26.14.03.30
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54764E31.2070607@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:03:29 +0000
From: Robert Bradley <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <CAA93jw68EUNHyJRrKYZuc0egXZaC_9oUysqZEN-YkNfNhc6ERA@mail.gmail.com>
	<E4B2D8FC-D37B-427F-BC18-2FB79C31AA33@toke.dk>
In-Reply-To: <E4B2D8FC-D37B-427F-BC18-2FB79C31AA33@toke.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:04:03 -0000


On 26/11/14 07:40, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen wrote:
> 2601:c:ce00:9d01 is 2601:000c:ce00:9d01
> 2601:c:ce00:9d1 is 2601:000c:ce00:09d1
>
> So no? :)

The issue is that this is supposedly a /60, and so only addresses in the
range 2601:c:ce00:9d0x::/60 are valid.  The question is actually about
how CeroWRT subnet hints cope with nybble alignment of subnets as
opposed to byte/octet alignments.

--=20
Robert Bradley