Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erkki Lintunen <ebirdie@iki.fi>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] an option for a new platform?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:33:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548A9A66.1040002@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6ZNnveqsxpa8L-AtNxAmkNPrtiGxj03C=DcExfo=i2PQ@mail.gmail.com>


Hello,

while enjoying and reading another thread from the list...

> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime?
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
[snip]
> But frankly, I would prefer for most of the chaos there to subside and to find
> a new, additional platform, to be working on before resuming work,
> that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. And
> to be more openwrt compatible in whatever we do, whatever that is.

this reminded me that another day I passed a web-page of a platform and
in the hope this has not been on the list yet passing it forward.

<http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm>

An interesting tidbit in the platform is the choice of firmware, I
think. Haven't seen any board yet with the similar choice by the
manufacturer. With a quick summing from the vendor part catalog, the
platform is sub 200 EUR (238 USD in current exchange rate) for an about
working assembly of 3x 1GbE, 4G ram, 1G flash, 802.11a/b/g/n radio...

I can't say anything how capable the hw might be for the stated inbound
shaping performance. I have had an ALIX board from their previous
generation for years and its been humming nicely though I haven't pushed
it to its envelope.

Best
Erkki

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-12  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10 22:52 [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime? Dave Taht
2014-12-11 19:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-12-11 21:50   ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  0:18     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-12-12  0:22       ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  0:32 ` Aaron Wood
2014-12-12  0:42   ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  7:33     ` Erkki Lintunen [this message]
2014-12-12 14:52       ` [Cerowrt-devel] an option for a new platform? Dave Taht
2014-12-13 23:02         ` David P. Reed
2014-12-16  9:02           ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  1:30 ` [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime? Joseph Swick
2014-12-12  1:52 ` Jim Gettys

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548A9A66.1040002@iki.fi \
    --to=ebirdie@iki.fi \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox