From: Erkki Lintunen <ebirdie@iki.fi>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Announcing New airFiber24HD
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5493E0FF.1020809@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw42aStSS=zuX+QMf50oZ85e5RR3fyUAfRiXA8qJCTYqpQ@mail.gmail.com>
FWIW...
On 12/17/2014 11:40 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> well... I loved that they aimed for low latency in their design.
Other big players seem to aim for low latancy as well, although in
different wireless network technology and in reality yet far away from
readily available products compared to the airFiber.
Just yesterday a finnish magazine Elektroniikka Lehti published an
article (in finnish), where Research Director of Nokia Networks is cited
to say:
"Nokia's vision 5G network means a system that brings users the best
10-gigabit data rates of one millisecond delay, but on the one hand, for
example, should IoT machine to run on battery power for 10 years. These
requirements for the data rate is the easiest to achieve, after all,
Nokia [has] already [demoed] LTE-Advanced technology 4.1 gigabit link.
One millisecond of latency is a very tough technical challenge."
Translation by Google, mods marked [] by me, link to the original article
<http://etn.fi/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2222:zte-testaa-jo-5g-tukiasemaa&catid=13&Itemid=101>
Google Traslator does pretty good translation except on a sentence in
the beginning:
"ZTE, the test was examined in particular the so-called. Massive MIMO
Solutions, where the base station antenna 128 is used for the head."
should be
"In the test ZTE examined in particular the so-called Massive MIMO
Solutions, where the base station has 128 antenna heads."
Best,
Erkki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-19 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bc856e62a9254399365d0277b0c0c6a5a85.20141217183443@mail35.atl31.mcdlv.net>
2014-12-17 18:41 ` Dave Taht
2014-12-17 19:20 ` David Lang
2014-12-17 21:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-12-17 21:40 ` Dave Taht
2014-12-17 22:41 ` David Lang
2014-12-19 8:25 ` Erkki Lintunen [this message]
2014-12-19 13:02 ` Dave Taht
2014-12-17 22:49 ` David Lang
2014-12-18 15:10 ` Outback Dingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5493E0FF.1020809@iki.fi \
--to=ebirdie@iki.fi \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox