From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vs14.mail.saunalahti.fi (vs14.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.117.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vs14.mail.saunalahti.fi", Issuer "vs14.mail.saunalahti.fi" (not verified)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B96421F6D5 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:29:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from vams (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vs14.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 849217400D2 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:28:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by vs14.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626147400D2 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:28:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from radio2.ebirdie (dsl-jnsbrasgw2-58c076-229.dhcp.inet.fi [88.192.118.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5553B40076 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:28:56 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by radio2.ebirdie with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1ssR-0003Kv-G6 for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <5493E0FF.1020809@iki.fi> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:25:35 +0200 From: Erkki Lintunen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <15610.1418851812@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Announcing New airFiber24HD X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:29:30 -0000 FWIW... On 12/17/2014 11:40 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > well... I loved that they aimed for low latency in their design. Other big players seem to aim for low latancy as well, although in different wireless network technology and in reality yet far away from readily available products compared to the airFiber. Just yesterday a finnish magazine Elektroniikka Lehti published an article (in finnish), where Research Director of Nokia Networks is cited to say: "Nokia's vision 5G network means a system that brings users the best 10-gigabit data rates of one millisecond delay, but on the one hand, for example, should IoT machine to run on battery power for 10 years. These requirements for the data rate is the easiest to achieve, after all, Nokia [has] already [demoed] LTE-Advanced technology 4.1 gigabit link. One millisecond of latency is a very tough technical challenge." Translation by Google, mods marked [] by me, link to the original article Google Traslator does pretty good translation except on a sentence in the beginning: "ZTE, the test was examined in particular the so-called. Massive MIMO Solutions, where the base station antenna 128 is used for the head." should be "In the test ZTE examined in particular the so-called Massive MIMO Solutions, where the base station has 128 antenna heads." Best, Erkki