Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] another contender for WNDR replacement
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:28:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C543F2.2010207@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5F5LFSxBAGhV4v+gOk8tLtM88PUofVyk_67rBaT1NNvg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2015-01-25 20:16, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> wrote:
>> Here's another candidate:
>> http://us.dlink.com/products/connect/wireless-ac1200-dual-band-gigabit-cloud-router-dir-860l/
>>
>> CPU: MT7621 (dual-core MIPS, 880 MHz, 4 virtual CPUs)
>> The device has preliminary OpenWrt support already. In my tests, handles
>> ~820 Mbit/s NAT without any special acceleration features (with fq_codel,
>> no shaping). Haven't done any tests with shaping yet.
> 
> One of the many things on my todo list is to roll an RFC in the hope some vendor
> can meet it. High on that list would be the ability to do inbound
> traffic shaping at
> up to about 300Mbits.
> 
>> Wifi (MT7612E) is still buggy with my mt76 driver, but I'll fix that in
>> March when I get back from vacation.
> 
> Ah, this is the new chip with the driver support for actually implementing per
> tid (station) queues? Is this the master repo for that or is it mainlined?
Yes.

> https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/commits/master
This is the master repo right now. I will mainline it once I've
stabilized it and added support for a few similar chips.

> Guess we have to get around to implementing a codel with a weighted
> per-active-station average for the target, and start layering the other
> stuff in on top...
Right.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-25 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-19 13:46 Sebastian Moeller
2015-01-19 16:37 ` Dave Taht
2015-01-19 23:44   ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-01-25 11:09 ` Felix Fietkau
2015-01-25 19:16   ` Dave Taht
2015-01-25 19:28     ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2015-02-18  9:28   ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-02-18  9:30     ` Dave Taht
2015-02-18  9:38       ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54C543F2.2010207@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox