From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2625421F5A9 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:14:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c9so21178139qcz.6 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:14:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SIYlGq3/Y9GQwgPJlOa4/Lek41S+VuH4HPbuN7lWMb4=; b=yc220mmLr/jN9HjBLDoVDb5P6HPwUC8wfWhcx3dIyu77C4/xZkflgkTADgm93G2JHm d+ijvaJuaFS8dD7w5aQVOH22SdDQxaGlCm2iEF71jfLXdgE1VnrB8Y6YCpUUgPcLz1Jw MXKKJjxpAs2sLMw6G7SVniD3sGKwJ0FfEtNYbC8iBJCpL7pt3+wBSx3xQjELgWVS+T8g LQJpbxTcfwMlK7v+H5LdpdJG3cl80Hp6x6YLoQNrvRfPS9+jj0/I7Z36f1PQ+kCjhMOT IfM0AW43c8QG1ktvRKnzDmD91Wzd7fsxESOtu6tdqb+4l57uXc1kpIQHDFD49SbzrybW tObQ== X-Received: by 10.229.19.3 with SMTP id y3mr13800645qca.1.1422634498839; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:14:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.206] (207-180-163-171.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.180.163.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w63sm10382892qgd.44.2015.01.30.08.14.56 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:14:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54CBADFF.4040509@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:14:55 -0500 From: Richard Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Outback Dingo , Richard Smith References: <54B5D28A.3010906@gmail.com> <7B1EA8F0-FCB6-4A37-950F-2558FC751DE8@gmail.com> <54C038D0.1000305@gmail.com> <54C0BD22.3000608@gmail.com> <54C13F47.1010203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Recording RF management info _and_ associated traffic? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:15:28 -0000 On 01/25/2015 03:07 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > my first initial and only thought is over stauration on your network, i > dont see anything of enterprise grade APs listed with 30+ users, how > many connections and how many users? are they all trying to > download/move data at the same time. Looking at the leases file we have 90 devices getting IPs. That's about right for the 30 or so people + all the other devices connected. The users are split up now on 3 APs all on different channels. 1 AP on the 11th floor: (tplink stock) 16-20 clients. 2 APs on the 10th floor: (tplink stock and Wndr3700v2 OpenWRT) each 10 floor AP has 10ish clients You can see all AP's from both floors but the AP not on the floor with you has a pretty low signal. Low but still usable. From watching what's going on at the radiotap level via horst I don't see a very high level of utilisation but I've still not been able to catch things in the act of a total fail yet. -- Richard A. Smith