From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B9D21F36D for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wevk48 with SMTP id k48so19020212wev.5 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=30E/jfwZ+id0o1nEYy96MUjsLp3klv6Cf5ul30rLTHQ=; b=0KHvUaT96+E9S1vBSpyhxkgfcHDOQw8wJcHtJqsEP4MgaO805+lQsuPvzY6UZmM+Zp hJ2gglX8EHhWB9av+dDTyNF+k+l6JarL2zwQseWfUDxu001Zka5ELr4pexVjlA5xq4aU jjxXktZMmXL9OTDRWwxFNl4wHzf1s7NINgEKXJ9/OM+Hup19QdR2m+VnZjd2dFmCtgh0 onQ1QtnMvhfNIrl+jrpmTyPtDRx/a/sRsxPX35oc0fwjIdv3QJsKCqN9iSmW+dYMd0aW ybfhsOGZUaECK74sRMCKmo/mQ23DXn8FUOd0phcrRFGt1e/YcRTL0qlC7ewLP61trasm kfaQ== X-Received: by 10.194.110.233 with SMTP id id9mr91441428wjb.136.1426193031419; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from volcano.localdomain (host-89-243-103-128.as13285.net. [89.243.103.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bx3sm11630412wjc.21.2015.03.12.13.43.50 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5501FA85.7020107@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:43:49 +0000 From: Alan Jenkins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rich Brown References: <7DFEBF4E-513B-4F41-B559-46BC9857AB40@gmail.com> <5501F7B7.9040105@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5501F7B7.9040105@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt bits not in OpenWrt (renamed thread) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:44:22 -0000 On 12/03/15 20:31, Alan Jenkins wrote: > On 12/03/15 16:43, Rich Brown wrote: >> - BB seems to have bloat, and I don't understand how to install and >> configure the QoS/SQM scripts. > > Install qos-scripts package. package install requires first updating, > since package cache does not persist over reboots. Pleasantly that > detail isn't too obscure in luci System -> Software. "Update lists" > button is at the top & there's a neighboring label saying "No package > lists available". > > The install doesn't automatically enable the `qos` init script. Maybe > it's a general policy like how Fedora treats daemons. You must > > `/etc/init.d/qos enable`, or use luci System -> Startup > >> (And is there a Luci GUI?) > > luci-app-qos. Installing that package will pull in qos-scripts for > you. It's an easy way to enable qos. qos is disabled by default... > which made three steps so far just to enable it. Though I suppose you > need to enter the upload / download speed here anyway, before it can > sensibly be enabled. Gah, that was stupidly unclear. I mean 1. luci-app-qos gives you a nice page under Network -> QOS. 2. There's a config to enable qos, separate from enabling the init script, after you've installed qos-scripts. It's a pity it's not just enabled once you start the init script. luci could just give you a button on the QOS page to enable/disable the init script (and start/stop at the same time!). Job done.