From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7374721F3C4; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:8bb2:53e0:366d:946e:fb09:dc15] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8bb2:53e0:366d:946e:fb09:dc15]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BC3D48096; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:06:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <55028CB6.80101@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:07:34 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgQ2FyZG9uYQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloat , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:36:12 -0700 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] marketing #102 - giving netperf-wrapper a better name? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:08:08 -0000 Le 13/03/2015 00:01, Dave Taht a écrit : > as netperf-wrapper has grown to include far more tests than netperf, > with quite a few more on their way, calling it this is increasingly > less appropriate: > > A noted cynic wrote me privately last month, about netperf-wrapper: > > 'why don't you rename the friggin thing "bufferbloat" or > "bloattest" or something? Netperf-wrapper is a terrible name, > seemingly still whatever the programmer called it when he wrote the > first sketchy version, one step up from "foo"' Bloatalyzer ? Cheers, Rémi