From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arrakis.dune.hu (arrakis.dune.hu [78.24.191.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E684E21F1FE for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.dune.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arrakis.dune.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7F128C691; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:53:19 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on arrakis.dune.hu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AXB_HELO_HOME_UN,BAYES_00, HELO_LH_HOME autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from nf.lan (p5DDC4324.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.220.67.36]) by arrakis.dune.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:53:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <550726B8.2060807@openwrt.org> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:53:44 +0100 From: Felix Fietkau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Taht , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] did a chaos calmer openwrt build, untested X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:54:17 -0000 On 2015-03-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote: > I folded in the following: > > * minstrel-blues As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", this is a minor set of minstrel tweaks. > * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp) Is this the same patches that you sent a while back? > * babel-1.6.0 release candidate > * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs > > I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2. > It is NOT cerowrt... > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/ Where's the source? I can't find it on your github... > 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this > ticket. > > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194 Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be a device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet. > 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by > security model" mode? > > 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing > * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully > finally make it up to openwrt) > * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0) The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;) - Felix