From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (p-mail2.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.16]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505FD21F377; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AD46B1074003; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:14:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF6F1074001; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:14:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.161.225] (10.193.161.225) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:14:48 +0100 Message-ID: <550C2B58.8020403@orange.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:14:48 +0100 From: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David P. Reed" , "Livingood, Jason" , Greg White References: <20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org> <123130.1426635142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca> <1426773234.362612992@apps.rackspace.com> <1426796961.194223197@apps.rackspace.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , bloat Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:15:21 -0000 FYI, we have this in France. http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=8571&tx_gsactualite_pi1[uid]=1701&tx_gsactualite_pi1[annee]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[theme]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[motscle]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[backID]=26&cHash=f558832b5af1b8e505a77860f9d555f5&L=1 ARCEP is the equivalent of FCC in France. User QoS is measured in the fixed access by third parties. The tests they run can be ameliorated of course but the concept is right. The data is then published periodically. Luca On 03/20/2015 03:08 PM, David P. Reed wrote: > M-Lab is better by far. But control by Google automatically discredits > it's data. As well as the claims by operators that measurements by > independent parties violate their trade secrets. Winning that battle > requires a group that can measure while supporting a very expensive > defense against lawsuits by operators making such claim of trade secrecy.