Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>,
	 cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Dnsmasq-discuss]  DNSSEC and www.ietf.org
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:02:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552BCC88.3000908@petit-huguenin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55294C81.9000709@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]

On 04/11/2015 10:32 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 16:03, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>> On 03/30/2015 12:42 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> for cerowrt-3.10? Really wasn't planning on it. Didn't even know there
>>> was a problem til today...
>> So I suppose that means that Cerowrt is now unmaintained and that I should switch to something else, because my job requires near constant access to www.ietf.org and I will not disable DNSSEC.
>>
>> So, what would you recommend for my WNDR3800?
>>
>> Thanks.
> 
> Openwrt chaos calmer trunk (latest) as of a day ago has dnsmasq 2.73rc4
> with suitable handling for DNSSEC.   Certainly I've DNSSEC enabled and
> can browse the site you mention without obvious problem.

I confirm that with openwrt trunk, I am now able to securely resolve www.ietf.org.

Thanks.

> 
> The automatic determination of 'valid current time' and hence checking
> signature timestamps has an issue:  The startup script uses 'touch -t
> 1970epoch timestampfile' to pre-create a timestamp file which slightly
> defeats the inbuilt dnsmasq logic...not helped by the fact '-t' is an
> invalid option.
> 


-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-13 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-30 15:52 [Cerowrt-devel] " Marc Petit-Huguenin
2015-03-30 15:58 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-30 16:19   ` David Personette
2015-03-30 17:49   ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Dnsmasq-discuss] " Simon Kelley
2015-03-30 18:17     ` Marc Petit-Huguenin
2015-03-30 18:42       ` Dave Taht
2015-04-11 15:03         ` Marc Petit-Huguenin
2015-04-11 16:32           ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-04-11 16:49             ` Dave Taht
2015-04-11 19:13               ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-04-13 14:02             ` Marc Petit-Huguenin [this message]
2015-04-11 16:38           ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552BCC88.3000908@petit-huguenin.org \
    --to=marc@petit-huguenin.org \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox