From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www62.your-server.de (www62.your-server.de [213.133.104.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD2521F22A for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [83.76.24.107] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YmfGM-0000T2-0t; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:23:38 +0200 Message-ID: <553E0019.4070704@iogearbox.net> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:23:37 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= References: <553DF3C7.2000301@iogearbox.net> <874mo23px8.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <874mo23px8.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.98.5/20384/Mon Apr 27 06:36:55 2015) Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ding dong is the debian drop tail queue dead? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:52:14 -0000 On 04/27/2015 11:01 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Daniel Borkmann writes: > >> Based on the version, looks like it takes one more stable release >> (219-7 is in experimental): >> >> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/systemd > > ...but looking at the packaging rules for that (the 219-7 in > experimental), it seems debian does not use the upstream rules. The > debian 'rules' file contains: > > rm -f debian/install/*/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf > > > An old changelog from v204 (dated Apr 26 last year) has this explanation: > > * Do not install sysctl.d/50-default.conf because the systemd package > should not change kernel policies, at least until it will become > the only supported init system. Okay :/ In that case, Fedora should hit that earlier as far as I can see. [ https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/systemd ] > -Toke >