Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" [still] didn't
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 12:54:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5585545B.6040108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE2AnZgDm7YriLbB6W0BvZyg8SavpgKbn2VxfYvSavTTgg@mail.gmail.com>

On 20/06/15 12:00, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> I can probably glean more information from "tc -s qdisc".
>
> However, my hypothesis is still that the version of cake you have is 
> old, while the version of tc that you have is newer.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>

Hi

I missed that, thanks.  (Error checking in qdiscs would be cool, I like 
error messages even that just say -EINVAL).

I can't think of any other way to check, but I had a look in 
ceropackages-3.10.git.  It should be up to date, it fetches the specific 
git commit (by sha1) that's on the head of the cake repo :(.  Strange 
failure on Dave's build if it's not.

I ran sqm-scripts to pass atm/40 to cake.  Here's what that looks like.  
Did you mean me to run some load first, if so what sort?

Regards
Alan


qdisc cake 8011: dev pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 970Kbit 
besteffort flows atm overhead 0
  Sent 850 bytes 9 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
            Class 0
   rate       970Kbit
   target      18.7ms
interval     149.8ms
Pk delay         2us
Av delay         0us
Sp delay         0us
   pkts             9
way inds           0
way miss           1
way cols           0
   bytes          850
   drops            0
   marks            0
qdisc ingress ffff: dev pppoe-wan parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
  Sent 1944 bytes 18 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
...
qdisc cake 8012: dev ifb4pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 15500Kbit 
besteffort flows atm overhead 0
  Sent 2340 bytes 18 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 3 requeues 0)
  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
            Class 0
   rate     15500Kbit
   target       5.0ms
interval     105.0ms
Pk delay       152us
Av delay         2us
Sp delay         2us
   pkts            18
way inds           0
way miss           1
way cols           0
   bytes         2340
   drops            0
   marks            0

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-20 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-20 10:55 Alan Jenkins
2015-06-20 11:00 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-06-20 11:54   ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2015-06-20 12:46     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-06-20 12:48       ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5585545B.6040108@gmail.com \
    --to=alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox