From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FED821F774; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t68IbCaj003728 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <559D6DD7.9020806@isi.edu> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:37:11 -0700 From: Joe Touch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Taggart , Rich Brown References: <559B2513.3020909@isi.edu> <559B53E8.90201@isi.edu> <8CBE744B-CE0D-4C44-A4B1-C7FB27403E1D@gmail.com> <20150707181911.7759D208@taggart.lackof.org> In-Reply-To: <20150707181911.7759D208@taggart.lackof.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, touch@isi.edu Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] failing to find the "declared victory" in a current wifi router X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:38:21 -0000 Hi, Matt, On 7/7/2015 11:19 AM, Matt Taggart wrote:... > This message made me realize I hadn't posted the CC+SQM HOWTO I > wrote, maybe it will be useful, > > https://we.riseup.net/lackof/openwrt FWIW, this is a big step in the direction I was suggesting. Thanks! The other step, IMO, would be two flags in the OpenWRT list of hardware: - a flag/color that indicates that the most recent hardware rev supports BB - a different flag/color that indicates that the most recent hardware rev supports CC The current list is a confusing mix of information about very old, sometimes EOL (end-of-life) equipment. To those who have invited me to participate in the research, thanks, but sometimes I just want to *use* a solution. I'm OK with a buggy, partially unstable one, but I don't always want to dive into developer-mode for every system I'd like to test out. Joe