From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC8A21FE92 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4C420789; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:13:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=eUB KniTkLkmlI9dSI0hpuT33gbs=; b=MdPtzuh0EFXibFGaHH1L9Z476rsyxThb0Cx Tc4WKhhDSPH5nL76BGZyMJfDf1vsx/4E6JzurcSvaye/d5sKkG4/5XRFKztf9R3g xbHqAhIAY0/rOj/Y4ydu7swKffTzsEpXzYNYww9gEiEQXThGERzeNY2XaenuyRzN nSI2bSqY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=eUBKniTkLkmlI9dSI0hpuT33gbs=; b=Frqbc LoDRd7VtFmz/fS5Jk+FUwwlddaEviRcnRmAt1U+KeL5wW3/Mhitp8BFB/QnTacrA D85LfE7c9gLkaKSq4ONumjk1kpnzzg1ZPBTMwGP3AgpQjDxhC9oYppEMfEOQmxla a5r/p+3vGWUv93zqAZYig8AAzCfSagBaAxEbGc= X-Sasl-enc: I4Wgnpb0/ZJbhmah7MtjwmmBkDcg593HITJTqwO2Mvwg 1436526805 Received: from [192.168.42.126] (host-89-241-202-53.as13285.net [89.241.202.53]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3E4546800E1 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:13:25 -0400 (EDT) To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Fred Stratton Message-ID: <559FA8D4.2030305@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:13:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Correct syntax for cake commands and atm issues. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:13:55 -0000 I transitioned from ceroWRT to lupin, now at undisclosed version 4, to try cake. I have a renown poor ADSL line, connected to TalkTalk. After getting a 60 GBP discount by negotiating with a woman and her imaginary Manager friend in Bangalore a month ago, I have no intention of moving to fibre. The wiki page gives insufficient detail. I am currently using a bridged device to connect to the internet, and so have a pppoe-wan interface on the WNDR3800. I do not use PPPoA ever. Whatever options I use with cake, the flow is either raw, or atm overhead is listed as 0. I do not know what commands - or probably, more correctly, options - can be used, and in which order incoming ... cake bandwidth 11500kbit besteffort can you add atm overhead 38 (does not work, returns 0) or are besteffort and atm mutually exclusive? Do I need to use the term 'flows' somewhere? do terms such as 'pppoe-vcmux; need to be preceded by 'atm'? More clarity is needed, I suggest, or a man page equivalent. On June 20th what I am experiencing was described by Alan Jenkins on the cake list. I note the latest posting by DT on this Cero-devel list apparently using an ADSL line as a source example, only uses raw flows.