From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C4221FE8B for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B93620960; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:11:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:11:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ZsbddSn6wU5ZvKPuBt2b8CWv9Ko=; b=c+ygj4 KIfAcVQM5G0UM4vRcXJls7O2c8YJqkkfvuKS6oSJ2edK2uDQNusjOjltGEFj6U2W fax3unojkgeR4mwkQAo+QBGUBN0Z9caPjwPxqxEpPZzz8650VIfDj9RneS4Z2mPN boo0GUtBMqrU+G+rIZs/Ui/b4aoMMINVIaTts= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=ZsbddSn6wU5ZvKP uBt2b8CWv9Ko=; b=Ao3W5+o99V3h6B1Z2vBqMbHVFYKvKZwg/COWwV6NCmLZMee DaV24+YYK2VZVAo54hJZo/VkALTLentMOU8oeSf1OoucKkEL1prQwUU1J+NvLrrT sRe1CqFaVtX3GkHt3TgQUFeyoOX9eVUwqdfWJ7Z+zy73cbMyppxfMARaE1/8= X-Sasl-enc: 0U5RKqjFrp4dkB+ZRiEs78zASv44p8/XSUd0ZI4hU2t7 1436533918 Received: from [192.168.42.126] (host-89-241-202-53.as13285.net [89.241.202.53]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B08E6801EE; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:11:57 -0400 (EDT) To: Jonathan Morton , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <559FA8D4.2030305@imap.cc> From: Fred Stratton Message-ID: <559FC49D.7090505@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:11:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Correct syntax for cake commands and atm issues. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:12:28 -0000 I am using the latest version compiled by DT, after you last made this incompatibility comment on the cake list. I happen to have compiled separately a build with your changes of 22 days ago incorporated, but based on lupin undisclosed version 2. I shall try that. I am making an assumption throughout this that qdiscs should be used on the WAN side always, effectively before the firewall. Is this assumption correct? On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite > lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are > several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal, > and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with > "overhead" or "atm". > > What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version > of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely, > but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this > combination crop up ourselves recently. > > - Jonathan Morton >